Re: Copyright from the lcs-projekt!? [dwarf@polaris.net: Re: First cut at testing and validation]
Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@datasync.com> wrote:
> Anthony> And the LCS is, at the moment, free to put it's
> Anthony> documentation under a non-free license, and have it in main.
>
> Verbatim, I thought we are leaning towards.
Sure, the "won't fit in main" argument is easily resolvable.
Even there, though, it's reasonable to think about replacing verbatim
standards with free standards.
--
Raul
Reply to: