Re: Copyright from the lcs-projekt!? [dwarf@polaris.net: Re: First cut at testing and validation]

[Raul Miller <rdm@test.legislate.com>]

Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@datasync.com> wrote:
> 	There seems no reason that a legal document can't be put under
>  a rename-and-distinguish-is-you-change-a-letter clause.

This is a good point.  We should encourage RMS to fix the GPL.

> 	We also follow these other non-legal non free standards, with
>  nary a complaint: ISO/ANSI C, ISO/ANSI POSIX,  We try to follow UNIX 98
> 
> 	We need to get consistent, as you say.

Well, as I see it as long as we are converging on our goal we're
doing ok.

At some point, I suppose we need to sponsor compatible replacements for
the above standards.  But that doesn't mean we have to be 
creating new standards which are akward for us to use.

-- 
Raul