Re: Copyright from the lcs-projekt!? [dwarf@polaris.net: Re: First cut at testing and validation]
On Fri, Aug 14, 1998 at 01:03:46PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> Hi,
> >>"Michael" == Michael Bramer <michael@weh.rwth-aachen.de> writes:
>
> Michael> It is not acceptable, that a official announce debian-redhat
> Michael> projekt produce non-free software!
>
> Sheer Hyprocrisy. It si OK to have the DFSG which is non-free
> (no license to redistribute that I can see); it is OK to have most of
> our software depend on a license that itself is non-free (taken a
> look at the GPL lately?), but it is not OK for the LCS? How do you
> justify that? We follow the FSSTND, which is also non-free. Explain
> that one.
People have stated over and over and over that these things should be
under a license that says: "you may change this, but you must make it
clear that it is changed, and you cannot use the original title, or
even mention it". What are the problems with this?
--
David Welton http://www.efn.org/~davidw
Debian GNU/Linux - www.debian.org
Reply to: