Re: Copyright from the lcs-projekt!? [firstname.lastname@example.org: Re: First cut at testing and validation]
Dale Scheetz <email@example.com> wrote:
> I include it again hear in the spirit of communication. This is not
> presented as a finished work, but was intended to protray the level
> of modularity and the types of issues that the preliminary standard
> is trying to address. My expectation was to get a lot more questions
> about what was being tested than about whether the copyright is free
> enough for Debian.
Well, you're right in the sense that it's too trivial to matter. I can't
even tell if it will be possible to derive a work from this which could
rate a tar archive as ok/not-ok. [I know it wouldn't be legal...]
But is that what we are supposed to expect of the finished work as
a whole? That it will be too trivial to matter?