Re: FHS: a new way of looking at it
Hi,
>>"Ben" == Ben Gertzfield <che@debian.org> writes:
Ben> Perhaps a combination of this idea and the 'fhs' package that provides
Ben> temporary relief from FSSTND iching and burning would work?
Well, I think that may not be required. I think that the only
loss of functionality is that people may not be able to
read documentation for FHS ready packages until they upgrade to
versions of document readers that were present in a release before
the first FHS package (ie, modified readers in hamm-update; fhs in
slink; of modified doc readers in slink, fhs packages in the next
release).
This should be sufficient. Even people upgrading from bo
should be OK, as long as they also upgraded the man/info readers
Ben> I think a good place to start is to file wishlist-severity bugs on man
Ben> and info to get them configured to also support /usr/share/man/ et al.
I concur.
manoj
--
The formalized CS education we have in Soviet Union yields really
awful results for example the quantity of grads capable to write real
programs is about 2-3% after the CS Dept. of Moscow U (not the worst
one, be sure) - and those students who CAN program all are
self-educated hackers and as a rule they had terrible conflicts with
educational authorities. Some of the most talented programmers here
are still students in their 30s. Thus the practice is against
Dijkstra. Vadim Antonov (avg@hq.demos.su)
Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@acm.org> <http://www.datasync.com/%7Esrivasta/>
Key C7261095 fingerprint = CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: