Re: pdksh -> posixness?

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: pdksh -> posixness?
From: kaih@khms.westfalen.de (Kai Henningsen)
Date: 02 Aug 1998 13:24:00 +0200
Message-id: <6z7ff84Hw-B@khms.westfalen.de>
In-reply-to: <19980730151758.27601@test.legislate.com>
References: <199807301842.LAA28817@kroner.ucdavis.edu> <Pine.SOL.3.96.980730150712.20581B-100000@copland.udel.edu> <Pine.SOL.3.96.980730150712.20581B-100000@copland.udel.edu> <19980730151758.27601@test.legislate.com>

rdm@test.legislate.com (Raul Miller)  wrote on 30.07.98 in <19980730151758.27601@test.legislate.com>:

> The posix documentation isn't freely available, or I'd look it up
> myself.

Nope, but Unix98 (or at least large parts of it, including /bin/sh  
behaviour) is.

<a href="http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/7908799/toc.htm";>The Single  
UNIX Specification, Version 2</a>

I think there's even a yacc grammar for /bin/sh.

MfG Kai


--  
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: pdksh -> posixness?
  - From: Raul Miller <rdm@test.legislate.com>
- X/Open sh grammar [was: Re: pdksh -> posixness?]
  - From: David Frey <david@eos.lugs.ch>

Prev by Date: Re: Archive Restructuring - Package Pool
Next by Date: Re: what options do we have was Re: POSIX shell; bash ash pdksh & /bin
Previous by thread: Re: Archive Restructuring - Package Pool
Next by thread: Re: pdksh -> posixness?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread