debian-devel Aug 1998 by date

[previous month]

[previous page]

Page 5 of 5

[next page]

[Thread Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Other Debian Lists] [Debian Home]

Aug 28

Re: FW: Re: Vote taking software Manoj Srivastava
Re: [RFC] Exim as standard Debian MTA? Manoj Srivastava
Re: [RFC] Exim as standard Debian MTA? Manoj Srivastava
Re: [RFC] Exim as standard Debian MTA? Manoj Srivastava
Re: [RFC] Exim as standard Debian MTA? Raul Miller
Re: Naming of new 2.0 release Manoj Srivastava
Re: [offtopic] Earth calling Steve... (was: Re: Naming of new 2.0 release ) Manoj Srivastava
Re: Naming of new 2.0 release Michael Bramer
Silver CD's & vendors Greg Vence
Re: Name clashes [Was: Intent to package: molecular biology programs Martin Schulze
Re: Linuxconf Federico Di Gregorio
Re: Name clashes [Was: Intent to package: molecular biology programs Stephane Bortzmeyer
Rationale for the current numbering scheme Manoj Srivastava
Re: Linuxconf Martin Alonso Soto
Re: [RFC] Exim as standard Debian MTA? Mike Miller
Re: [RFC] Exim as standard Debian MTA? joost
Re: Rationale for the current numbering scheme Nils Lohner
Re: Intent to package: molecular biology programs Stephen J. Carpenter
Re: [RFC] Exim as standard Debian MTA? Andreas Jellinghaus
Re: Name clashes [Was: Intent to package: molecular biology programs Raul Miller
Re: Name clashes [Was: Intent to package: molecular biology programs treacy
Re: Intent to package knfsd Anders Hammarquist
Intent to package: libmldbm-perl, libapache-asp-perl Vincent Renardias
Re: [RFC] Exim as standard Debian MTA? Joseph Carter
Re: Problems compiling Stephen Zander
Re: Intent to package: libmldbm-perl, libapache-asp-perl Stephen Zander
Re: Intent to package: libmldbm-perl, libapache-asp-perl David Welton
Re: Intent to package: libmldbm-perl, libapache-asp-perl Michael Alan Dorman
Re: Intent to package: libmldbm-perl, libapache-asp-perl Vincent Renardias
Re: Intent to package: libmldbm-perl, libapache-asp-perl Brian Bassett
MIPS port? Jules Bean
Re: Intent to package: libmldbm-perl, libapache-asp-perl Stephen Zander
Re: MIPS port? Vincent Renardias
Request for feature: adduser --alias Raul Miller
Re: [RFC] Exim as standard Debian MTA? Robert Claeson
Re: [RFC] Exim as standard Debian MTA? Robert Claeson
Re: Request for feature: adduser --alias Shaleh
Re: [RFC] Exim as standard Debian MTA? David Welton
Re: [RFC] Exim as standard Debian MTA? Robert Claeson
Re: eject broken? Wichert Akkerman
Re: Beowulf cluster (fwd) Andrew Martin Adrian Cater
Re: Request for feature: adduser --alias Raul Miller
[crispin@CSE.OGI.EDU: StackGuard-protected Linux and a New StackGuard Compiler] Bernd Eckenfels
Re: Intent to package: molecular biology programs John Lapeyre
Re: Name clashes [Was: Intent to package: molecular biology programs John Lapeyre

Aug 29

intent to package: another m2c John Lapeyre
Re: Intent to package: molecular biology programs Drake Diedrich
Re: userid for vmailer Philip Hands
Re: Naming of new 2.0 release Joey Hess
Re: [RFC] Exim as standard Debian MTA? Steve Lamb
Re: Intent to package: molecular biology programs John Lapeyre
Re: [RFC] Exim as standard Debian MTA? Manoj Srivastava
Re: [RFC] Exim as standard Debian MTA? Raul Miller
Re: Request for feature: adduser --alias Guy Maor
Re: Request for feature: adduser --alias Raul Miller
No benefit for running sash as root shell? Raul Miller
Re: eject broken? Martin Mitchell
Re: No benefit for running sash as root shell? Nathan E Norman
Re: No benefit for running sash as root shell? Shaleh
India wildfire+p
Re: [RFC] Exim as standard Debian MTA? Steve Lamb
Re: Request for feature: adduser --alias Joseph Carter
Re: [RFC] Exim as standard Debian MTA? Steve Lamb
Re: No benefit for running sash as root shell? Guy Maor
Re: more developer identity stuff Gregory S. Stark
Re: Uploaded lintian 0.8 (source all) to erlangen Gregory S. Stark
Re: Intent to package: molecular biology programs Tyson Dowd
Re: Name clashes [Was: Intent to package: molecular biology programs Tyson Dowd
Re: more developer identity stuff Stephen J. Carpenter
installed 2.0 Kenneth Scharf
Re: SSH v2 License --- much less free than v1 Marcus Brinkmann
Re: [RFC] Exim as standard Debian MTA? Manoj Srivastava
Re: Linuxconf Marcus Brinkmann
Re: [RFC] Exim as standard Debian MTA? Manoj Srivastava
Re: more developer identity stuff Igor Grobman
anybody in Naperville (IL) (= three weeks away) Ardo van Rangelrooij
Re: more developer identity stuff john
Re: [RFC] Exim as standard Debian MTA? Raul Miller
Re: [RFC] Exim as standard Debian MTA? Raul Miller
Re: No benefit for running sash as root shell? Raul Miller
Re: Request for feature: adduser --alias Michael Meskes
Re: Request for feature: adduser --alias Michael Meskes
Re: intent to package: another m2c Michael Meskes
Re: No benefit for running sash as root shell? Michael Meskes
Re: Request for feature: adduser --alias Raul Miller
Re: No benefit for running sash as root shell? Raul Miller
Re: [RFC] Exim as standard Debian MTA? Manoj Srivastava
Re: [RFC] Exim as standard Debian MTA? Raul Miller
Seyon's copyright. Igor Grobman
Re: Seyon's copyright. Joey Hess
Problems trying to build 2.88 meg image. Dale Scheetz
Re: No benefit for running sash as root shell? Guy Maor
Re: SSH v2 License --- much less free than v1 Guy Maor
Re: Problems trying to build 2.88 meg image. Martin Schulze
Re: Request for feature: adduser --alias Guy Maor
Re: Seyon's copyright. Guy Maor
Re: Problems trying to build 2.88 meg image. Dale Scheetz
Re: Problems trying to build 2.88 meg image. Martin Schulze
Re: Problems trying to build 2.88 meg image. Dale Scheetz
Re: [RFC] Exim as standard Debian MTA? Marco d'Itri
Re: Problems trying to build 2.88 meg image. Jeff Noxon
Re: Name clashes [Was: Intent to package: molecular biology programs Wichert Akkerman
Re: Modula-3 compiler (SRC M3 and PM3) Anthony Fok

Aug 30

kernel NFS Wichert Akkerman
Re: more developer identity stuff Ossama Othman
Re: more developer identity stuff Nathan E Norman
Re: No benefit for running sash as root shell? Bill Mitchell
Re: more developer identity stuff Steve Lamb
Re: more developer identity stuff Guy Maor
stable-updates now called proposed-updates Guy Maor
Re: No benefit for running sash as root shell? Guy Maor
Re: more developer identity stuff Ossama Othman
Re: No benefit for running sash as root shell? Joel Klecker
Bug#26010: marked as done (Errors in cd_autoup.sh) Debian Bug Tracking System
Re: more developer identity stuff Ossama Othman
Re: more developer identity stuff Nathan E Norman
Re: No benefit for running sash as root shell? Nathan E Norman
Re: Problems trying to build 2.88 meg image. Dale Scheetz
Re: [RFC] Exim as standard Debian MTA? Jim Pick
Re: No benefit for running sash as root shell? Manoj Srivastava
tzset() Karl M. Hegbloom
Re: stable-updates now called proposed-updates Branden Robinson
Re: kernel NFS Andreas Jellinghaus
Mailing lists - no CCs? (was Re: more developer identity stuff) Jules Bean
Re: No benefit for running sash as root shell? Jules Bean
Re: Request for feature: adduser --alias Michael Meskes
Re: No benefit for running sash as root shell? Michael Meskes
Intent to package shapeTools Matthias Klose
Re: Problems trying to build 2.88 meg image. Martin Schulze
Re: Intent to package: libmldbm-perl, libapache-asp-perl Miquel van Smoorenburg
Re: No benefit for running sash as root shell? Wichert Akkerman
Intent to package gcc-i386-gnu Santiago Vila
Re: package configuration design Karl M. Hegbloom
Re: Linuxconf Stig Sandbeck Mathisen
Re: package configuration design Karl M. Hegbloom
Re: [RFC] Exim as standard Debian MTA? Martin Mitchell
Re: Seyon's copyright. Stig Sandbeck Mathisen
Re: Naming of new 2.0 release Rob Browning
Re: tzset() Jim Pick
Re: No benefit for running sash as root shell? Jules Bean
Re: No benefit for running sash as root shell? Jules Bean
Re: Naming of new 2.0 release Jeff Noxon
Re: Bugs ? Richard Braakman
Re: No benefit for running sash as root shell? Raul Miller
Re: No benefit for running sash as root shell? Miquel van Smoorenburg
Re: No benefit for running sash as root shell? Miquel van Smoorenburg
Work for developers Hartmut Koptein
Independent lockfile package. Rob Browning
Re: Mailing lists - no CCs? (was Re: more developer identity stuff) Guy Maor
Re: Intent to package gcc-i386-gnu Guy Maor
Re: Mailing lists - no CCs? (was Re: more developer identity stuff) Raul Miller
Re: Mailing lists - no CCs? (was Re: more developer identity stuff) Raul Miller
Work for developers Matthias Klose
Re: package configuration design Federico Di Gregorio
Strange Lintian warning Lars Steinke
Re: Mailing lists - no CCs? (was Re: more developer identity stuff) Manoj Srivastava
Did something happen to the GNU install-info? Rob Browning
Re: Mailing lists - no CCs? (was Re: more developer identity stuff) Manoj Srivastava
Re: Mailing lists - no CCs? (was Re: more developer identity stuff) Igor Grobman
Re: intent to package: mocka modula-2 compiler Rob Browning
Re: [RFC] Exim as standard Debian MTA? Alexander Koch
Re: Work for developers Branden Robinson
Re: Work for developers Dan Jacobowitz
Re: developer database comments Daniel Martin at cush
Re: No benefit for running sash as root shell? Wichert Akkerman
Build engines Gregory S. Stark
Re: [RFC] Exim as standard Debian MTA? Joseph Carter
Re: Independent lockfile package. Federico Di Gregorio
Re: Strange Lintian warning Federico Di Gregorio
Build engines Gregory S. Stark
The Debian Project Manual (was: The Debian History Document) Will Lowe
Re: intent to package: another m2c John Lapeyre
Re: Work for developers John Lapeyre
Re: intent to package: mocka modula-2 compiler John Lapeyre
force e2fsck @ reboot Martin Schulze
Re: force e2fsck @ reboot Elie Rosenblum
Re: Independent lockfile package. Raul Miller

Aug 31

Re: force e2fsck @ reboot Martin Schulze
Re: more developer identity stuff Hamish Moffatt
CLUES WANTED: [otaylor@redhat.com: Re: xlib6 problem in Debian] Branden Robinson
software licensing Derek B. Noonburg
Processed: f Debian Bug Tracking System
Re: Independent lockfile package. fog
Re: software licensing fog
Re: Work for developers Enrique Zanardi
Re: Cheapbytes mess-up debian [FW: Debian 2.0 CD's] shaul
Re: Mailing lists - no CCs? (was Re: more developer identity stuff) Bob Hilliard
Re: Cheapbytes mess-up debian [FW: Debian 2.0 CD's] Gerhard Poul
SUMMARY: Intent to package: molecular biology programs Stephane Bortzmeyer
Re: Intent to package: molecular biology programs Stephane Bortzmeyer
Re: Intent to package: molecular biology programs Enrique Zanardi
Re: more developer identity stuff Lars Wirzenius
Re: Intent to package gcc-i386-gnu Santiago Vila
Re: Work for developers John Goerzen
Re: Cheapbytes mess-up debian [FW: Debian 2.0 CD's] Tyson Dowd
Re: Mailing lists - no CCs? (was Re: more developer identity stuff) Ben Pfaff
Re: force e2fsck @ reboot Miquel van Smoorenburg
Re: SUMMARY: Intent to package: molecular biology programs Drake Diedrich
Re: Work for developers Martin Mitchell
How to mirror the latest Debian tree ? Lars Steinke
Re: software licensing Raul Miller
Re: SSH 2 bignum code legal? (fwd) Anthony C. Zboralski
About the GPL fog
Wanting to packge ultrasound drivers. Chris McKillop
Re: Work for developers jdassen
Re: more developer identity stuff Nathan E Norman
Re: more developer identity stuff Lars Wirzenius
Re: Bug#26010: Errors in cd_autoup.sh Nag
Re: About the GPL Ben Pfaff
Re: SSH 2 bignum code legal? (fwd) Philippe Troin
Re: Work for developers Martin Mitchell
snmptraplogd Bernd Schumacher
IP Multicasting in default kernel? Ossama Othman
Re: software licensing Derek Noonburg
Re: SSH v2 License --- much less free than v1 Stephen Zander
Re: Intent to package: libmldbm-perl, libapache-asp-perl Stephen Zander
Re: Work for developers Stephen Zander
Re: SUMMARY: Intent to package: molecular biology programs Enrique Zanardi
Network address problems John Goerzen
Re: About the GPL Enrique Zanardi
Re: Network address problems Tim Sailer
continued problems with 2.88 meg image Dale Scheetz
Bug#26010: (no subject) Keita Maehara
Re: continued problems with 2.88 meg image Jeff Noxon
Re: About the GPL David Frey
Re: About the GPL David Welton
Re: About the GPL Federico Di Gregorio
Re: About the GPL Avery Pennarun
Re: About the GPL David Welton
Re: About the GPL Michael Bramer
Re: intent to package: mocka modula-2 compiler Christian von Roques
Re: About the GPL Avery Pennarun
Re: SUMMARY: Intent to package: molecular biology programs John Lapeyre
Problem with update-alternatives? Rob Browning
Re: continued problems with 2.88 meg image Dale Scheetz
Re: Intent to package: molecular biology programs John Lapeyre
Intent To Package: GLE 3.3h Holger Eitzenberger
Re: continued problems with 2.88 meg image Jeff Noxon
Re: intent to package: mocka modula-2 compiler John Lapeyre
Final: A mechanism for updating Debian Policy documents Manoj Srivastava
Re: continued problems with 2.88 meg image Dale Scheetz
Re: Intent To Package: GLE 3.3h John Lapeyre
Re: Wanting to packge ultrasound drivers. Martin Alonso Soto
Re: Seyon's copyright. Martin Schulze
Re: About the GPL john
Re: About the GPL john
Re: stable-updates now called proposed-updates Martin Schulze
Re: continued problems with 2.88 meg image Jens Ritter
Re: About the GPL Michael Bramer
Re: software licensing Derek Noonburg
Re: How to mirror the latest Debian tree ? Rob Browning
Re: Work for developers Marcus Brinkmann

Sep 01

Intent to package: wnlib James R. Van Zandt
Re: Work for developers Hamish Moffatt
Re: continued problems with 2.88 meg image Hamish Moffatt
magic point Justin Maurer
Re: Network address problems John Goerzen
Re: software licensing Daniel Martin at cush
Re: Network address problems Tim Sailer
Re: Work for developers John Goerzen
Re: software licensing john
Re: software licensing Dan Jacobowitz
Re: Work for developers Dan Jacobowitz
Re: magic point Drake Diedrich
Re: software licensing Gregory S. Stark
Re: more developer identity stuff Rob Browning
Re: About the GPL Gregory S. Stark

The last update was on 06:04 GMT Sun Oct 25. There are 2267 messages. Page 5 of 5.

[previous month]

[previous page]

Page 5 of 5

[next page]

[Thread Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Other Debian Lists] [Debian Home]

Mail converted by MHonArc