debian-devel Aug 1998 by date
[
previous month
]
[
first page
]
[
previous page
]
Page 4 of 5
[
next page
]
[
last page
]
[
next month
]
[
Thread Index
] [
Subject Index
] [
Author Index
] [
Other Debian Lists
] [
Debian Home
]
Aug 21
Re: developer database comments
treacy
Intent to package TkTable, BLT & moodss
Lars Steinke
Intent to package "ACE library"
Ossama Othman
Re: Can we do without non-free?
Philip Hands
Re: developer database comments
Manoj Srivastava
Fakeroot failing
Steve McIntyre
Re: Status of Debian on the PowerMacs?
Rob Browning
Re: Can we do without non-free?
Rob Browning
Re: Fakeroot failing
Rob Browning
Re: Shadow file permissions
Turbo Fredriksson
Re: developer database comments
treacy
Re: developer database comments
Manoj Srivastava
Offering up libforms packages for adoption
Ben Gertzfield
abiword
John Lapeyre
Aug 22
Re: Can we do without non-free?
Bill Leach
Re: developer database comments
Stephen J. Carpenter
Re: In what package can I find <anyfile>?
Junio Hamano
Re: Shadow file permissions
Guy Maor
Re: Shadow file permissions
Manoj Srivastava
Re: Shadow file permissions
Turbo Fredriksson
Re: Shadow file permissions
Stephen J. Carpenter
Re: Shadow file permissions
Stephen J. Carpenter
Re: Shadow file permissions
Joey Hess
Re: Fakeroot failing
Steve McIntyre
Re: Fakeroot failing
Steve McIntyre
New maintainer wanted for mutt and mutt-i.
jdassen
Re: New maintainer wanted for mutt and mutt-i.
Tommi Virtanen
Re: Shadow file permissions
Guy Maor
NIST-PCTS needs a Debian maintainer
Dale Scheetz
Re: Shadow file permissions
Nathan E Norman
bug system eating reports
Adrian Bridgett
Re: New maintainer wanted for mutt and mutt-i.
Alexander Koch
Re: NIST-PCTS needs a Debian maintainer
Joseph Carter
Re: New maintainer wanted for mutt and mutt-i.
Martin Schulze
Re: MPICH up for adoption
Ward Deng
Re: Gnome and libtool
Ward Deng
Re: Shadow file permissions
Stephen J. Carpenter
Re: developer database comments
James R. Van Zandt
Re: PCMCIA - Partial "never mind"
Michael Dietrich
Re: MPICH up for adoption
Ossama Othman
Re: MPICH up for adoption
Jules Bean
Re: MPICH up for adoption
Martin Schulze
Re: MPICH up for adoption
Joey Hess
Aug 23
Re: MPICH up for adoption
Ossama Othman
intent to package r-pdl
John Lapeyre
Re: tclx package in hamm? (online help in Emacs for tcl commands)
David Engel
Re: MPICH up for adoption
Raul Miller
dpkg & autoconf
Raul Miller
Re: dpkg & autoconf
Marcus Brinkmann
Re: Shadow file permissions
Michael Meskes
Re: MPICH up for adoption
Branden Robinson
Re: Status of Debian on the PowerMacs?
Martin Schulze
Intent to package tcpview
Florian Hinzmann
How does the Replaces control field work?
Marco Budde
Re: How does the Replaces control field work?
Guy Maor
Re: In what package can I find <anyfile>?
Steve Greenland
Re: Gnome and libtool
Adam P. Harris
more developer identity stuff
Ossama Othman
Re: more developer identity stuff
Raul Miller
Re: more developer identity stuff
Ossama Othman
Re: more developer identity stuff
Havoc Pennington
Re: New maintainer wanted for mutt and mutt-i.
Marco d'Itri
Aug 24
Re: more developer identity stuff
Stephen J. Carpenter
Re: more developer identity stuff
Joseph Carter
intent to package: vtk, ivmaps
John Lapeyre
Re: more developer identity stuff
Manoj Srivastava
Re: more developer identity stuff
Buddha Buck
Re: Bug#26010: Errors in cd_autoup.sh
Nag
Re: more developer identity stuff
Jules Bean
Re: Stop vi discussion
Michael Dietrich
eject broken?
Michael Dietrich
Re: xanim and the dotofiles
Michael Dietrich
Re: more developer identity stuff
M.C. Vernon
spice3 is being GPL-ed
Joop Stakenborg
Request for Help with Roxen and Pike
Martin Schulze
Re: Request for Help with Roxen and Pike
Martin Schulze
Re: more developer identity stuff
Stephen J. Carpenter
bootup problem with the boot images
Alexander Koch
Re: more developer identity stuff
Hamish Moffatt
Re: tclx package in hamm? (online help in Emacs for tcl commands)
Peter S Galbraith
Naming of new 2.0 release
Martin Schulze
Re: eject broken?
Martin Mitchell
Re: more developer identity stuff
Stephen J. Carpenter
Re: developer database comments
Paul Slootman
Re: more developer identity stuff
Ossama Othman
Virtual Poohsticks
M.C. Vernon
Re: more developer identity stuff
Raul Miller
Re: Naming of new 2.0 release
Dale Scheetz
Re: eject broken?
Stephen Zander
Re: Naming of new 2.0 release
Javier Fdz-Sanguino Pen~a
Re: Naming of new 2.0 release
Lars Wirzenius
Linux distribution HOWTO
Javier Fdz-Sanguino Pen~a
Re: Naming of new 2.0 release
john
Re: Naming of new 2.0 release
i97bf
debian-cd scripts
Nathan E Norman
Re: Naming of new 2.0 release
Nils Lohner
Re: Naming of new 2.0 release
Martin Schulze
Re: Naming of new 2.0 release
Steve Lamb
Re: Naming of new 2.0 release
Johnie Ingram
Re: Naming of new 2.0 release
Martin Schulze
Re: Naming of new 2.0 release
Vincent Renardias
Re: Naming of new 2.0 release
Martin Schulze
Re: dpkg mechanism suggestion
Andreas Jellinghaus
Re: Re: Naming of new 2.0 release
Kenneth Scharf
Re: Re: Naming of new 2.0 release
Martin Schulze
Re: Re: Naming of new 2.0 release
Steve Lamb
Re: more developer identity stuff
Joseph Carter
Re: Linux distribution HOWTO
john
Re: Linux distribution HOWTO
David Welton
gcc: -dynamic is not default as it should be
Karl M. Hegbloom
Re: debian-cd scripts
Andreas Jellinghaus
Re: debian-cd scripts
Nathan E Norman
Re: Linux distribution HOWTO
Nathan E Norman
Re: dpkg NMU for slink
Karl M. Hegbloom
Emacs policy
Peter S Galbraith
Re: debian-cd scripts
Andreas Jellinghaus
dpkg suggestion
Andreas Jellinghaus
Re: dpkg NMU for slink
Johnie Ingram
Re: dpkg NMU for slink
Jason Gunthorpe
Re: dpkg suggestion
Vincent Renardias
Licence question. Where does this package go?
Stig Sandbeck Mathisen
Re: Naming of new 2.0 release
Kysh Dragon
Re: Licence question. Where does this package go?
David Welton
intent to package linklint
Sudhakar Chandrasekharan
vnc package?
Steve Lamb
Re: vnc package?
aqy6633
Re: dpkg suggestion
Stephen J. Carpenter
Re: eject broken?
Edward Betts
Aug 25
Re: debian-cd scripts
John Lapeyre
Re: Licence question. Where does this package go?
John Lapeyre
Re: debian-cd scripts
Philip Hands
Re: Naming of new 2.0 release
Philip Hands
Re: Naming of new 2.0 release
john
Re: Bug#26091: Old version of rasmol??
John Lapeyre
Re: Naming of new 2.0 release
John Lapeyre
Re: Linux distribution HOWTO
Chuck Peters
moving, out of touch for 1.5-2.5 weeks.
Kevin
Re: debian-cd scripts
Guy Maor
Re: Naming of new 2.0 release
peloy
Re: Naming of new 2.0 release
Guy Maor
Re: Naming of new 2.0 release
Manoj Srivastava
Re: more developer identity stuff
Manoj Srivastava
Re: Naming of new 2.0 release
Chris Davis
2.0 install problem
matthew.r.pavlovich.1
Re: debian-cd scripts
Matthias Klose
Re: Licence question. Where does this package go?
Andreas Jellinghaus
Re: bootup problem with the boot images
Christian Meder
Re: Naming of new 2.0 release
Martin Schulze
Re: Naming of new 2.0 release
Martin Schulze
Re: Naming of new 2.0 release
Philip Hands
Re: Linux distribution HOWTO
Martin Schulze
Re: Linux distribution HOWTO
Wichert Akkerman
Re: dpkg suggestion
Wichert Akkerman
Re: Linux distribution HOWTO
Santiago Vila
Re: dpkg suggestion
Santiago Vila
Re: dpkg suggestion
Vincent Renardias
Re: Naming of new 2.0 release
Philip Hands
Re: Naming of new 2.0 release
servis
Re: Naming of new 2.0 release
Dan Jacobowitz
Re: Naming of new 2.0 release
john
Re: Re: Naming of new 2.0 release
Michael Stone
Re: Naming of new 2.0 release
Michael Stone
Re: Linux distribution HOWTO
Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho
Re: dpkg suggestion
Lars Wirzenius
Re: Naming of new 2.0 release
Lars Wirzenius
Re: eject broken?
Martin Mitchell
Re: more developer identity stuff
Ossama Othman
Unidentified subject!
VANHULLEBUS Yvan
contrib boot disks on ftp (was Re: bootup problem with the boot images)
Jens Ritter
unsuscribe
VANHULLEBUS Yvan
mozilla problem
Michael Meskes
Intent to package gwydion
Shaleh
Re: mozilla problem
Avery Pennarun
Re: mozilla problem
servis
Re: dpkg suggestion
Andreas Jellinghaus
File renamer
David Welton
Re: more developer identity stuff
Manoj Srivastava
Re: File renamer
Bart Schuller
Re: File renamer
servis
Re: dpkg suggestion
Manoj Srivastava
Re: more developer identity stuff
Ossama Othman
Re: more developer identity stuff
Raul Miller
Re: dpkg suggestion
Raul Miller
Association program
vaidhy
Re: mozilla problem
Avery Pennarun
Re: contrib boot disks on ftp (was Re: bootup problem with the boot images)
Alexander Koch
Re: Association program
Avery Pennarun
Re: Intent to package gwydion
Edward Betts
Re: dpkg suggestion
Sven Rudolph
Re: Intent to package gwydion
Shaleh
Re: more developer identity stuff
Dale Scheetz
Swim 2.1 from LSL installation.
Alexander Kushnirenko
intent to packge: kali, bugsx
John Lapeyre
Intent to package wmifs
Ben Gertzfield
Re: Intent to package wmifs
Ruud de Rooij
Re: Intent to package wmifs
Ben Gertzfield
gIDE
Christian Leutloff
Re: dpkg suggestion
Edward Betts
free modula-2 compiler ?
John Lapeyre
Re: free modula-2 compiler ?
David Welton
Re: free modula-2 compiler ?
John Lapeyre
Re: Association program
Craig Sanders
Aug 26
Re: Naming of new 2.0 release
Philip Hands
Re: free modula-2 compiler ?
John Lapeyre
userid for vmailer
LaMont Jones
Re: free modula-2 compiler ?
John Lapeyre
Intend to package ethereal and geg
Frederic Peters
Re: Naming of new 2.0 release
Christian Hudon
Re: Naming of new 2.0 release
Steve Lamb
Re: Naming of new 2.0 release
Steve Lamb
Re: Naming of new 2.0 release
Nathan E Norman
Re: Naming of new 2.0 release
Steve Lamb
Re: Naming of new 2.0 release
Nathan E Norman
Re: Naming of new 2.0 release
Steve Lamb
intent to package: mocka modula-2 compiler
John Lapeyre
Re: Scheme/Lisp things
Peter Van Eynde
Intent to package rblsmtpd (rblsmtpd-src)
Philip Hands
Re: intent to package: mocka modula-2 compiler
John Lapeyre
Re: Intend to package ethereal and geg
Hamish Moffatt
Re: Naming of new 2.0 release
Jules Bean
Re: Naming of new 2.0 release
Tyson Dowd
Re: Naming of new 2.0 release
Lars Wirzenius
Commercial applications on Debian - What is libc.cat?
Rainer Dorsch
Re: Naming of new 2.0 release
Philip Hands
Re: Naming of new 2.0 release
Philip Hands
Re: Commercial applications on Debian - What is libc.cat?
Ben Pfaff
Re: free modula-2 compiler ?
Luis Francisco Gonzalez
XF86Setup...
chris
Marketing of Debian releases
joost
Re: Commercial applications on Debian - What is libc.cat?
Rainer Dorsch
Re: mozilla problem
joost
Re: Naming of new 2.0 release
Kenneth Scharf
Adopting Scilab
Christian Meder
Re: free modula-2 compiler ?
Michael Meskes
Re: mozilla problem
Michael Meskes
Re: Naming of new 2.0 release
Jules Bean
Re: userid for vmailer
Jean Pierre LeJacq
Re: mozilla problem
Michael Meskes
Re: [Debian]: Commercial applications on Debian - What is libc.cat?
Rainer Dorsch
[RFC] Exim as standard Debian MTA?
Vincent Renardias
Re: Naming of new 2.0 release
Steve Lamb
Re: [RFC] Exim as standard Debian MTA?
Avery Pennarun
Re: userid for vmailer
LaMont Jones
Re: Naming of new 2.0 release
Raul Miller
Re: Naming of new 2.0 release
Raul Miller
Re: Naming of new 2.0 release
Jeff Noxon
Re: Naming of new 2.0 release
Javier Fdz-Sanguino Pen~a
Re: Naming of new 2.0 release
Raul Miller
Re: Naming of new 2.0 release
Dale Scheetz
Re: Naming of new 2.0 release
Jaldhar H. Vyas
Re: Naming of new 2.0 release
Greg Vence
SSH v2 License --- much less free than v1
Philip Hands
Re: Naming of new 2.0 release
Steve Lamb
Re: Naming of new 2.0 release
Jeff Noxon
Re: Naming of new 2.0 release
Dale Scheetz
Re: Naming of new 2.0 release
Mike Miller
Re: Naming of new 2.0 release
Greg Vence
Re: Naming of new 2.0 release
Tyson Dowd
Re: Naming of new 2.0 release
Steve Lamb
Re: more developer identity stuff
Manoj Srivastava
Re: dpkg suggestion
Manoj Srivastava
Re: dpkg suggestion
Manoj Srivastava
Re: Intent to package wmifs
Marcelo E. Magallon
Re: dpkg suggestion
Steve Lamb
Re: SSH v2 License --- much less free than v1
Stephen Zander
Re: Naming of new 2.0 release
Dale Scheetz
Re: Naming of new 2.0 release
Steve Lamb
Re: SSH v2 License --- much less free than v1
David Welton
Re: Naming of new 2.0 release
Raul Miller
Re: Naming of new 2.0 release
Steve Lamb
Re: Naming of new 2.0 release
Sven Rudolph
Re: Naming of new 2.0 release
Raul Miller
Intent to package: SRP
Tom Wu
Re: dpkg suggestion
Raul Miller
Re: Naming of new 2.0 release
Steve Lamb
Re: libtclobjc package
Matthias Klose
Re: Naming of new 2.0 release
Dale Scheetz
Re: Intent to package: SRP
Ossama Othman
Re: Intent to package: SRP
Tom Wu
Re: Naming of new 2.0 release
Peter S Galbraith
Re: Naming of new 2.0 release
Raul Miller
Re: more developer identity stuff
Marcus Brinkmann
Re: more developer identity stuff
Ossama Othman
Re: Naming of new 2.0 release
Raul Miller
Re: Association program
vaidhy
Re: dpkg suggestion
Lars Wirzenius
Re: Adopting Scilab
Ward Deng
Re: Intend to package ethereal and geg
John Lapeyre
Re: Marketing of Debian releases
John Lapeyre
Re: Adopting Scilab
John Lapeyre
Cheapbytes mess-up debian [FW: Debian 2.0 CD's]
Edward Betts
Re: Cheapbytes mess-up debian [FW: Debian 2.0 CD's]
Neale Pickett
Re: Cheapbytes mess-up debian [FW: Debian 2.0 CD's]
Dale Scheetz
Re: Adopting Scilab
Ward Deng
Re: Naming of new 2.0 release
Dan Jacobowitz
Re: dpkg suggestion
Raul Miller
Re: Adopting Scilab
Raul Miller
Intent to create ACE toolkit package
Ossama Othman
Re: SSH v2 License --- much less free than v1
Stephen Zander
Re: Naming of new 2.0 release
Ward Deng
Re: SSH v2 License --- much less free than v1
john
Re: SSH v2 License --- much less free than v1
David Welton
Re: dpkg suggestion
Joseph Carter
Re: Adopting Scilab
John Lapeyre
Re: Adopting Scilab
Ward Deng
Intent to package knfsd
mdorman-debian-devel
Re: Adopting Scilab
Ward Deng
Re: [RFC] Exim as standard Debian MTA?
Joseph Carter
Intent to package OpenLDAP
Dermot John Bradley
[offtopic] Earth calling Steve... (was: Re: Naming of new 2.0 release )
Philip Hands
Re: Naming of new 2.0 release
Philip Hands
Re: SSH v2 License --- much less free than v1
Philip Hands
Re: SSH v2 License --- much less free than v1
Stephen Zander
Re: Naming of new 2.0 release
Philip Hands
Re: SSH v2 License --- much less free than v1
Raul Miller
Re: eject broken?
Michael Dietrich
Re: Adopting Scilab
Martin Bialasinski
Re: SSH v2 License --- much less free than v1
Stephen Zander
Re: SSH v2 License --- much less free than v1
Tom Wu
Aug 27
Re: dpkg suggestion
Lars Wirzenius
Re: Naming of new 2.0 release
Steve Lamb
Re: Naming of new 2.0 release
Steve Lamb
Re: Naming of new 2.0 release
Steve Lamb
Re: Naming of new 2.0 release
Steve Lamb
Re: Naming of new 2.0 release
Steve Lamb
Re: Naming of new 2.0 release
Steve Lamb
Re: XF86Setup...
Branden Robinson
Re: [offtopic] Earth calling Steve... (was: Re: Naming of new 2.0 release )
Steve Lamb
Re: [offtopic] Earth calling Steve... (was: Re: Naming of new 2.0 release )
Matt McLean
seeking Anthony Fok
Shaleh
Re: Naming of new 2.0 release
Raul Miller
Re: Naming of new 2.0 release
Raul Miller
Re: Naming of new 2.0 release
Raul Miller
Re: Naming of new 2.0 release
Nathan E Norman
Re: Naming of new 2.0 release
Hamish Moffatt
Re: Naming of new 2.0 release
Hamish Moffatt
Re: SSH v2 License --- much less free than v1
Hamish Moffatt
Re: Naming of new 2.0 release
Nathan Sandver
Re: SSH v2 License --- much less free than v1
Guy Maor
Re: SSH v2 License --- much less free than v1
Craig Sanders
Re: SSH v2 License --- much less free than v1
Raul Miller
Re: Cheapbytes mess-up debian [FW: Debian 2.0 CD's]
Craig Sanders
Re: Marketing of Debian releases
Craig Sanders
Re: Naming of new 2.0 release
Drake Diedrich
looking for a new maintainer for festival
Joey Hess
Re: eject broken?
Martin Mitchell
Re: [RFC] Exim as standard Debian MTA?
Alexander Koch
Please stop sending me mail.
Mpakopanos
Re: [offtopic] Earth calling Steve... (was: Re: Naming of new 2.0 release )
Philip Hands
Re: SSH v2 License --- much less free than v1
Philip Hands
OT: strange disk crash after upgrade
Federico Di Gregorio
Re: SSH v2 License --- much less free than v1
Heiko Schlittermann
Re: dpkg suggestion
Manoj Srivastava
Re: [RFC] Exim as standard Debian MTA?
Marco d'Itri
Re: userid for vmailer
Marco d'Itri
Re: Naming of new 2.0 release
Manoj Srivastava
Re: Naming of new 2.0 release
Manoj Srivastava
Re: Naming of new 2.0 release
Manoj Srivastava
Re: Naming of new 2.0 release
Manoj Srivastava
Re: Naming of new 2.0 release
Michael Bramer
Re: Intent to package knfsd
Andreas Jellinghaus
Re: [RFC] Exim as standard Debian MTA?
Andreas Jellinghaus
Re: SSH v2 [intent to package]
Tommi Virtanen
Re: [RFC] Exim as standard Debian MTA?
Michael Bramer
Re: [RFC] Exim as standard Debian MTA?
Andreas Jellinghaus
Re: SSH v2 [intent to package]
Richard Braakman
Re: Intent to create ACE toolkit package
Ole J. Tetlie
Re: Naming of new 2.0 release
Tyson Dowd
Re: Naming of new 2.0 release
Martin Schulze
Re: dpkg suggestion
Edward Betts
Re: dpkg suggestion
Edward Betts
Re: Naming of new 2.0 release
Michael Bramer
Re: [RFC] Exim as standard Debian MTA?
Michael Stone
Re: eject broken?
M . Dietrich
Re: Naming of new 2.0 release
Tyson Dowd
Re: Naming of new 2.0 release
Michael Bramer
Re: OT: strange disk crash after upgrade
Raul Miller
Re: dpkg suggestion
Raul Miller
Re: Intent to package knfsd
mdorman-debian-devel
Re: intent to package: mocka modula-2 compiler
Andreas Jellinghaus
Re: Naming of new 2.0 release
Raul Miller
Is the Debian Fortify package maintained?
Amos Shapira
Re: Naming of new 2.0 release
Martin Schulze
Re: OT: strange disk crash after upgrade
Russell Coker
Re: SSH v2 [intent to package]
Gergely Madarasz
Re: Bug#25689: xbase: Delete mapping in Xresources wrong if connecting from remote
Christoph Martin
Re: Naming of new 2.0 release
Michael Bramer
Re: eject broken?
Kenneth Scharf
Re: Is the Debian Fortify package maintained?
Tommi Virtanen
[off topic] Call to action! Help persuade NEC/videologic release docs for PowerVR 2nd gen
Ian Lynagh
Re: Naming of new 2.0 release
Michael Bramer
Re: Naming of new 2.0 release
Bill Leach
Re: Naming of new 2.0 release
Martin Schulze
Re: Naming of new 2.0 release
Stig Sandbeck Mathisen
Re: dpkg suggestion
Jules Bean
Re: Naming of new 2.0 release
Hamish Moffatt
Re: [RFC] Exim as standard Debian MTA?
john
Re: [RFC] Exim as standard Debian MTA?
Stephen J. Carpenter
Re: [RFC] Exim as standard Debian MTA?
Steve Kostecke
Re: Bug#25689: xbase: Delete mapping in Xresources wrong if connecting from remote
Christoph Martin
Re: userid for vmailer
Jean Pierre LeJacq
Re: userid for vmailer
Jason Gunthorpe
Re: dpkg suggestion
Jason Gunthorpe
Re: Intent to create ACE toolkit package
Ossama Othman
Re: Naming of new 2.0 release
John Goerzen
Re: Naming of new 2.0 release
Michael Bramer
Re: Naming of new 2.0 release
Martin Schulze
Re: SSH v2 [intent to package]
Richard Kaszeta
"Making a Debian Package" needs to be updated
Ossama Othman
Re: SSH v2 [intent to package - RETRACTED]
Tommi Virtanen
Re: Naming of new 2.0 release
Tyson Dowd
Re: Naming of new 2.0 release
servis
Re: Intent to package knfsd
Dale E. Martin
Vote taking software
Darren Benham
Re: Intent to create ACE toolkit package
Ole J. Tetlie
Re: Vote taking software
Tommi Virtanen
Re: Vote taking software
Darren Benham
Re: Vote taking software
Jason Gunthorpe
Re: Naming of new 2.0 release
Martin Schulze
Color Problem
rainer
Re: Vote taking software
Tommi Virtanen
Re: Vote taking software
Darren Benham
Re: Vote taking software
Jason Gunthorpe
Re: Vote taking software
Darren Benham
Re: Vote taking software
Tommi Virtanen
Re: SSH v2 License --- much less free than v1
Marco d'Itri
Re: SSH v2 License --- much less free than v1
David Welton
Re: SSH v2 License --- much less free than v1
Jules Bean
Re: [RFC] Exim as standard Debian MTA?
Joseph Carter
Re: SSH v2 License --- much less free than v1
David Welton
Re: [RFC] Exim as standard Debian MTA?
Joseph Carter
Re: [RFC] Exim as standard Debian MTA?
Joseph Carter
Re: dpkg suggestion
Manoj Srivastava
Re: [RFC] Exim as standard Debian MTA?
Steve Lamb
Re: dpkg suggestion
Manoj Srivastava
Re: Vote taking software
Manoj Srivastava
Re: [RFC] Exim as standard Debian MTA?
Manoj Srivastava
Re: Vote taking software
Jason Gunthorpe
FW: Re: Vote taking software
Darren Benham
Re: Vote taking software
Darren Benham
Away for two weeks
Martin Bialasinski
Re: [RFC] Exim as standard Debian MTA?
Andreas Jellinghaus
Re: [RFC] Exim as standard Debian MTA?
Andreas Jellinghaus
Re: Maybe it's time to split debian-devel-changes
Martin Schulze
Linuxconf
Federico Di Gregorio
Re: dpkg suggestion
Jules Bean
Re: [RFC] Exim as standard Debian MTA?
Raul Miller
Re: dpkg suggestion
Raul Miller
Re: intent to package: mocka modula-2 compiler
John Lapeyre
Re: dpkg suggestion
Jules Bean
Re: Emacs policy
Rob Browning
Aug 28
Re: Linuxconf
Martin Schulze
Re: userid for vmailer
Wichert Akkerman
Re: Naming of new 2.0 release
Steve Lamb
Re: Naming of new 2.0 release
Steve Lamb
Re: Naming of new 2.0 release
stephen . p . ryan
Re: Intent to package knfsd
Wichert Akkerman
Re: [offtopic] Earth calling Steve... (was: Re: Naming of new 2.0 release )
Steve Lamb
Re: Naming of new 2.0 release
Raul Miller
Re: [offtopic] Earth calling Steve... (was: Re: Naming of new 2.0 release )
Raul Miller
Re: [RFC] Exim as standard Debian MTA?
Jim Pick
Re: Naming of new 2.0 release
john
Re: Naming of new 2.0 release
Steve Lamb
Re: SSH v2 License --- much less free than v1
Steve Lamb
Re: [RFC] Exim as standard Debian MTA?
Steve Lamb
Re: [RFC] Exim as standard Debian MTA?
Steve Lamb
Re: Naming of new 2.0 release
Tyson Dowd
Apology to Steve Lamb
Raul Miller
unscribe
이준호
Re: Apology to Steve Lamb
Steve Lamb
Re: Apology to Steve Lamb
stephen . p . ryan
Re: [RFC] Exim as standard Debian MTA?
Jason Gunthorpe
Re: [RFC] Exim as standard Debian MTA?
Steve Lamb
Re: Naming of new 2.0 release
Ward Deng
Re: userid for vmailer
Marco d'Itri
Re: Intent to package knfsd
Andreas Jellinghaus
Bugs ?
Michael Bramer
Checking for changed conffiles
Anselm Lingnau
Re: [RFC] Exim as standard Debian MTA?
Christian Meder
Re: [RFC] Exim as standard Debian MTA?
Christian Meder
Re: Linuxconf
Craig Sanders
Re: [offtopic] Earth calling Steve... (was: Re: Naming of new 2.0 release )
Chris
Re: Linuxconf
M.C. Vernon
Re: Naming of new 2.0 release
Sven Rudolph
Re: Checking for changed conffiles
Jules Bean
Re: Bugs ?
Martin Schulze
Re: Bugs ?
Michael Bramer
Re: Bugs ?
joost
Re: Bugs ?
Luis Francisco Gonzalez
Re: Bugs ?
Michael Bramer
Re: Bugs ?
Santiago Vila
Re: Naming of new 2.0 release
Philip Hands
Re: eject broken?
Martin Mitchell
Re: eject broken?
Martin Mitchell
Re: Bugs ?
Martin Schulze
Re: [RFC] Exim as standard Debian MTA?
Stephen J. Carpenter
Intent to package: molecular biology programs
Stephane Bortzmeyer
Problems compiling
Martin Schulze
Name clashes [Was: Intent to package: molecular biology programs
Stephane Bortzmeyer
Re: Linuxconf
Philip Hands
The last update was on 06:04 GMT Sun Oct 25. There are 2267 messages. Page 4 of 5.
[
previous month
]
[
first page
]
[
previous page
]
Page 4 of 5
[
next page
]
[
last page
]
[
next month
]
[
Thread Index
] [
Subject Index
] [
Author Index
] [
Other Debian Lists
] [
Debian Home
]
Mail converted by
MHonArc