Re: "goals" for slink: FHS
>>"Clint" == Clint Adams <email@example.com> writes:
Clint> It seems to me that making provisions for a hybrid system would take
Clint> just as long as or longer than moving the paths abruptly. If we
Clint> can't muster enough effort to do this then we should stick with
Clint> the FSSTND for slink.
On the contrary, we should allw for incremental moves. Each
package responsible only for itself. We want to allow for a mixed
"Never put off until run time what you can do at compile time." David
Gries, in "Compiler Construction for Digital Computers", circa 1969.
Manoj Srivastava <firstname.lastname@example.org> <http://www.datasync.com/%7Esrivasta/>
Key C7261095 fingerprint = CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to email@example.com
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact firstname.lastname@example.org