Previously Manoj Srivastava wrote: > Hmm. I wonder. Is there areason for a flat heirarchy? Could > deeper nesting have value? For example, there could be a "folder" > called MUA (or something), and all mail user agents go there, a > higher level value (/top/mua/mailhosthostname) can be over ridden by > /top/mua/vm/mailhostname); it allows a group of packages to share a > default. Hmm, looks like I deleted something too much in rewriting the text. But the idea was that packages can have their own hieararchy. Only all packages are under the same root, to make it easier to find their information. Wichert.
Description: PGP signature