Re: RH and GNOME
Rob Browning wrote:
> Luis Francisco Gonzalez <email@example.com> writes:
> > The problem with say imlib is that he refuses to change the major
> > number even though the libraries are incompatible because it looks
> > ugly...
> You've *got* to be kidding. What is wrong with these people? If
> that's really the reason. I'm sure glad someone that lame's not in
> charge of libc.
> Assuming that the info in this thread's pretty accurate, I'm going to
> have to reconsider how much faith I want to put in E. I was
> considering switching to it when was released, but now other
> alternatives are looking better. I want something with a reasonable
> developer who works *with* others.
and judge for yourself. (Read the whole thread or ask Jim. Don't take my
word for it.)
> Furthermore, this just frees our resources for other things, and since
> the whole ball of wax is GPLed, there's nothing they could do (even if
> they wanted to, which I don't think they do) that we couldn't correct.
I sincerly hope that's the case.
Luis Francisco Gonzalez <firstname.lastname@example.org>
PGP Fingerprint = F8 B1 13 DE 22 22 94 A1 14 BE 95 8E 49 39 78 76
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to email@example.com
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact firstname.lastname@example.org