Re: Afterstep classic
Rev Joseph Carter wrote:
> I was already working on the package, actually.
> The package is essentially done, but I understand there were some
> bugs in 1.0 and I've been trying to find information about and fixes
> for them.
Well, I think that baseing your package on the afterstep_1.0-5.2
package would be a good idea.
Joel Rosdahl <firstname.lastname@example.org> (PGP-key available via finger and WWW)
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to email@example.com
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact firstname.lastname@example.org