Re: Licensing, was elvis package

To: "Mark W. Eichin" <eichin@kitten.gen.ma.us>, debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Licensing, was elvis package
From: Raul Miller <rdm@test.legislate.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Apr 1998 22:17:46 -0400
Message-id: <[🔎] 19980429221746.27689@hazel>
Mail-followup-to: "Mark W. Eichin" <eichin@kitten.gen.ma.us>, debian-devel@lists.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] xe1ogxlp150.fsf@paycheck.thok.org>; from Mark W. Eichin on Wed, Apr 29, 1998 at 02:55:55AM -0400
References: <[🔎] 199804281701.UAA25948@kby.netmedia.net.il> <[🔎] 19980428141739.32754@hazel> <[🔎] xe1ogxlp150.fsf@paycheck.thok.org>

Mark W. Eichin <eichin@kitten.gen.ma.us> wrote:
> The motif code in emacs is relatively new, and totally cosmetic.

Hm... in that case, I'm surprised it's there at all.

-- 
Raul


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org

Reply to:

References:
- Re: Licensing, was elvis package
  - From: Shaya Potter <spotter@kby.netmedia.net.il>
- Re: Licensing, was elvis package
  - From: Raul Miller <rdm@test.legislate.com>
- Re: Licensing, was elvis package
  - From: eichin@kitten.gen.ma.us (Mark W. Eichin)

Prev by Date: Re: Maybe alpha should be in hamm? (was: Re: Only m68k and i386 in hamm?)
Next by Date: Re: Pronouns (was Re: Proposed Constitution)
Previous by thread: Re: Licensing, was elvis package
Next by thread: Re: Licensing, was elvis package
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread