Re: Only m68k and i386 in hamm?
Martin Schulze <joey@kuolema.Infodrom.North.DE> writes:
> As far as I can see we only have disadvantages supporting
> hamm-powerpc. (no regular uploads, extra handling of security
> fixes to non-supported versions, frozen of _really unstable_
> binary set etc.)
I would make dinstall just throw all uploads for it to slink and
ignore hamm. That way porters don't have to worry that the package
says "frozen unstable".
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to email@example.com
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact firstname.lastname@example.org