Re: Licensing, was elvis package

To: Alex Yukhimets <aqy6633@acf5.nyu.edu>
Cc: kaih@khms.westfalen.de, debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Licensing, was elvis package
From: Raul Miller <rdm@test.legislate.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Apr 1998 11:19:45 -0400
Message-id: <[🔎] 19980427111945.28717@hazel>
Mail-followup-to: Alex Yukhimets <aqy6633@acf5.nyu.edu>, kaih@khms.westfalen.de, debian-devel@lists.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] E0yTpdK-0000Hw-00@jessica>; from Alex Yukhimets on Mon, Apr 27, 1998 at 11:15:54AM -0400
References: <[🔎] 19980427095712.23519@hazel> <[🔎] E0yTpdK-0000Hw-00@jessica>

Alex Yukhimets <aqy6633@acf5.nyu.edu> wrote:
> Well, GPL or less restrictive as far as source code redistribution is
> concerned. Right?

Unless you want to discuss the particulars of license details, yes.

-- 
Raul


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org

Reply to:

References:
- Re: Licensing, was elvis package
  - From: Raul Miller <rdm@test.legislate.com>
- Re: Licensing, was elvis package
  - From: <aqy6633@acf5.nyu.edu>(Alex Yukhimets)

Prev by Date: Re: Licensing, was elvis package
Next by Date: How to handle troff sources
Previous by thread: Re: Licensing, was elvis package
Next by thread: Re: Licensing, was elvis package
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread