Re: Providing a static e2fsck ?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On Thu, 19 Mar 1998, Yann Dirson wrote:
> Gregory pointed out some days ago that a [statically linked] e2fsck
> would be useful to have, to allow for recovery in case of a bad crash.
> [ ... ]
> Any opinions out there ?
We have discussed this some time ago, I think.
If we have a statically linked e2fsck, we should have also a statically
linked dpkg, or ls, or whatever.
Using the rescue disk have been the standard solution for this for a
long time.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3ia
Charset: latin1
iQCVAgUBNRJKoyqK7IlOjMLFAQEvaQQAntDf78BZTQZb0ovglQpV7AH7OCcG2+ID
+zNrwg0fiFCIH4XzLx/GGHTdJ1FWijJvD4Am+4B5iq3TRyM3CMXlq/plY0U1rdvw
TbilrfKpioBfhDI8srt4uhtpBkGUDLyGrBOOUwcg7cravWnuAig3fEq8Qb4IbtkT
4BaIErkpW9k=
=4IbH
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: