Re: sgml-tools depends on sp == problem
"Sven" == Sven Rudolph <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> "Adam P. Harris" <email@example.com> writes:
>> Sven, your package is causing problems with the new version of
>> jade, because the new jade conflicts/replaces/provides 'sp'. You
>> rely on a versioned 'sp', and that prevents installation of the new
>> jade if sgml-tools is installed.
> How big is jade? What about making several binary packages from the
> jade source ?
It's big and fat. It's just that it comes all together upstream.
But there does seem to be a separation between the SP tools and the
DSSSL tools. So I could actually continue to make both 'sp' and
'jade' out of the same source of course.
Anyone else want an SGML parser w/o a DSSSL parser? Should I split
them out? Both Manoj and Mark Eichin, the old maintainer, didn't seem
to think it's necessary.
>> I'd prefer if you could rely on either an unversioned 'sp' or else
>> rely on jade >= 1.1. Sorry for the inconvenience.
> I prefer to change the dependency to jade >= 1.1 when it is
Uploading now. Its got a few little nags I'll be cleaning up
today/tomorrow, but seems to be basically there.
Maybe you should hold off until we figure out how we're doing
.....A. P. Harris...apharris@onShore.com...<URL:http://www.onShore.com/>
E-mail the word "unsubscribe" to firstname.lastname@example.org
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST. Trouble? E-mail to email@example.com .