Re: RFC: libc5 uploads for bo
On 24 Nov 1997, tibor simko wrote:
> >>>>> "christian" == Christian Schwarz <schwarz@monet.m.isar.de> writes:
>
> christian> For example, package foo
> christian> with version 2.5-1 in stable and 2.5-2 in unstable will
> christian> get 2.5-1-2.5-2 in bo-unstable.
>
> humpf! when i do:
>
> $ dpkg --compare-versions 2.5-1-2.5-2 lt 2.5-2; echo $?
>
> i get:
>
> 1
>
> so it seems that the proposed bo-unstable version number isn't lower
> than the corresponding hamm version number?! :-(
(Oh no! Not again...)
> i prefer the following proposition instead:
>
> >>>>> "fabrizio" == Fabrizio Polacco <fpolacco@icenet.fi> writes:
>
> fabrizio> bo-unstable unstable
> fabrizio> last bo package 1.2-4 ---
> fabrizio> old package 1.2-4bo5 1.2-5
> fabrizio> new package 1.2-4bo6 1.2-6
> fabrizio> newer package 1.2-4bo7 1.2-7
> fabrizio> non-maintainer 1.2-4bo7.1 1.2-7.1
>
> (note: i preferred to write 1.2-4bo5 instead of fabricio's 1.2-4.bo5)
>
> and i would add that when debianizing a new upstream release of the
> package, one can put
>
> bo-unstable unstable
> new package 1.3-0bo1 1.3-1
> newer package 1.3-0bo2 1.3-2
> non-maintainer 1.3-0bo2.1 1.3-2.1
>
> as i'll probably do myself with the gnuplot package for bo-unstable,
> since gnuplot hamm version is already out as `m.n-1'. is it okay to
> do it in this `m.n-0bo1' way?
I didn't know how to extend Fabrizio's proposal for new upstream versions,
so I dropped it. Now that you have found a solution we can use it,
provided that it works. I leave it to the others to check whether this
solution finally works.... :-)
Thanks,
Chris
-- Christian Schwarz
Do you know schwarz@monet.m.isar.de, schwarz@schwarz-online.com,
Debian GNU/Linux? schwarz@debian.org, schwarz@mathematik.tu-muenchen.de
Visit PGP-fp: 8F 61 EB 6D CF 23 CA D7 34 05 14 5C C8 DC 22 BA
http://www.debian.org http://fatman.mathematik.tu-muenchen.de/~schwarz/
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org .
Trouble? e-mail to templin@bucknell.edu .
Reply to: