Re: Debian will move glibc-2.1?
> > > IMO, glibc 2.1 is still too volatile for general use. You are free to
> > > build and use it yourself.
> > OK, I try to glibc 2.1 on my own risk.
> > But, I have to maintain some Debian package.(Just beta test in Japanese
> > Debian users group.)
> > If I install glibc2.1 on my hamm environment, can I maintain
> > Debian package for glibc 2.0?
> Yes, but you'll have to install glibc 2.1 so it is not used by default
> when you compile something.
Tnx. All right. It's a reasonable solution.
I'll try so.
Araki Yasuhiro // NAIST email@example.com, yasu@Mew.org
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
Trouble? e-mail to firstname.lastname@example.org .