Re: debstd-like tool for those who don't want to use debmake
Andreas Jellinghaus wrote:
> this way you have spilted debstd and maybe better documented it, but not
> removed some basic flaws of debstd.
Could you please let me know which flaws you're talking about?
> another advantage : with an "autorules" similiar to automake, you don't
> need the program itself, if you only want to compile and build.
I don't think this is too important an objection. Build machines are
expected to be rather complete.
see shy jo
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
Trouble? e-mail to firstname.lastname@example.org .