Re: Hamm: Exim + Chos standard?
> > > Both qmail (which proved insecure <most evil grin>)
> >
> > To what are you referring ?
>
> Probably what was reported on the djb-qmail mailing list, where you
> start sending data, but no CR-LF, down the line and qmail malloc's
> some memory for it, then malloc's some more, and some more, etc. I
> haven't heard of anything else.
As has been discussed ad nauseam on the djb-qmail mailing list, this is
something that should be handled by ulimits, and is NOT a security bug
(although it is arguably a documentation bug).
Next ;-)
Cheers, Phil.
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org . Trouble?
e-mail to templin@bucknell.edu .
Reply to: