Re: Package organization issue...
'Dale Scheetz wrote:'
>On 26 Apr 1997, Michael Alan Dorman wrote:
>> Dale Scheetz <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
>> > Third:This is really just a personal request. I think that mc should be
>> > part of standard. This would bring libgpm1 into standard as well.
>> I like mc, too, but it's not got any claim at all to being standard.
>> It'd a DOS-ism applied to Unix.
>How do we decide something like this?
Or should git be standard? I think it will take a few more years
before mc or git is standard enough to be standard.
Christopher J. Fearnley | Linux/Internet Consulting
email@example.com | Design Science Revolutionary
http://www.netaxs.com/~cjf | Explorer in Universe
ftp://ftp.netaxs.com/people/cjf | "Dare to be Naive" -- Bucky Fuller
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
Trouble? e-mail to firstname.lastname@example.org .