Re: Emacs and XEmacs coexisting
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On 28 Jan 1997, Milan Zamazal wrote:
> >>>>> "Fred" == Frederic Lepied <Frederic.Lepied@sugix.frmug.org> writes:
>
> Fred: One solution is to compile packages only with XEmacs because
> Fred: Emacs is backward compatible. I don't know what is the impact.
>
> I don't know whether every Emacs package maintainer has XEmacs. And
> whether each Emacs package can be compiled under XEmacs. And what
> about when Emacs and XEmacs will have more incompatible bytecode
> formats in future?
>
> I think two directories are more robust.
>
> Milan Zamazal
>
>
I compiled most emacs packages with xemacs with no problems at all. But
I'm still agreed with Milan about two compiled directory except if we can
have a policy between the two developpers groups about compatibility of
byte-compiled code. (I think, helas, that isn't the case :( )
- ---------------------------------------------------------------
"For every complex and difficult problem there is
always a simple and easy solution... and it's wrong."
-- H.L. Mencken
- ---------------------------------------------------------------
Fabien Ninoles aka le Veneur aka le Corbeau
E-mail: Ninf01@gel.usherb.ca
WebPage: http://www-edu.gel.usherb.ca/ninf01
Finger me for my pgp key (finger ninf01@gel.usherb.ca)
- ---------------------------------------------------------------
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2
iQCVAwUBMu6Av1X6fc7jcjhFAQGRKwQAh/3iN+tAhWyQ59KMuhfIIZRwwdlu1hV4
/nh5340U38nfR0IvnbGxusAAYNHi3an1jS1IxuVS3erEnbWgTWkLRxE4VVMctECO
sf4J3oQSPINbhRJo7wdtJKi90yJqEHSW/RzdC4xUUk8YI6ySfSNqokbngod4NJMm
f8v8YiFKE8I=
=RZT/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-devel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org . Trouble? e-mail to Bruce@Pixar.com
Reply to: