Re: Problems with 1.2.1
On 11 Jan 1997, Kevin Dalley wrote:
> Christian Schwarz <email@example.com> writes:
> > On Fri, 10 Jan 1997, John Goerzen wrote:
> > So perhaps we should change the policy for package releases in the
> > stable-fixed distrib: There should be at least 3 people reviewing the
> > newer versions and only if they agree, they could be included in the next
> > release.
> Review by one person who likes to say "no" is better than what we have
> I suggest that any upload which is planned for stable or frozen
> requires a justification for being placed in stable or frozen. If it
> doesn't fix a critical and submitted bug, that upload should be
> rejected. That means that a developer-discovered bug for stable and
> frozen must be submitted.
But IMHO we need someone other than the maintainer to do the review. Just
mentioning some bug fixes in the changes isn't enough justification! At
least a second person has to agree with the upload.
-- _,, Christian Schwarz
/ o \__ firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com,
! ___; firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com
\\\______/ ! PGP-fp: 8F 61 EB 6D CF 23 CA D7 34 05 14 5C C8 DC 22 BA
\ / http://fatman.mathematik.tu-muenchen.de/~schwarz/
"DIE ENTE BLEIBT DRAUSSEN!"
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-devel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org . Trouble? e-mail to Bruce@Pixar.com