Re: ppp 2.2.0f-7 uploaded to master
The stripping issue is pretty evident. As to the other issue: There was a
long discussion on debian-devel. -8 installes the links again.
On Sat, 5 Oct 1996, Michael Meskes wrote:
> Christoph Lameter writes:
> > Format: 1.5
> > Date: Wed, 2 Oct 1996 09:00:00 -0800
> > Source: ppp
> > Binary: ppp
> > Architecture: source i386
> > Version: 2.2.0f-7
> > Distribution: unstable
> > Urgency: low
> > Maintainer: Christoph Lameter <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> > Description:
> > ppp - Point-to-Point Protocol (PPP) daemon.
> > Changes:
> > ppp (2.2.0f-7) unstable; urgency=low
> > .
> > * fixed a couple of bugs in postinst script.
> > * pppd not stripped
> Does that mean pppd is not stripped anymore? Or does it mean it is stripped?
> If it's the former I would like to know the reason for this behaviour. AFAIK
> the guidelines say we should strip binaries.
> > * etc/rc.d links for /etc/init.d/ppp not installed anymore
> I don't think this is conform to the guidliens either.
> > * /etc/init.d revised
> Michael Meskes | _____ ________ __ ____
> email@example.com | / ___// ____/ // / / __ \___ __________
> firstname.lastname@example.org | \__ \/ /_ / // /_/ /_/ / _ \/ ___/ ___/
> email@example.com | ___/ / __/ /__ __/\__, / __/ / (__ )
> Use Debian GNU/Linux! | /____/_/ /_/ /____/\___/_/ /____/
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-devel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org . Trouble? e-mail to Bruce@Pixar.com