Re: The return of RMS and GNU/Linux
firstname.lastname@example.org (Marcus Daniels) wrote on 27.05.96 in <199605280449.VAA00791@sayre.sysc.pdx.edu>:
> `lignux' as a configuration alias communicates information. Supposing
It's about the same thing as if the Debian project decided to call the
emacs package "linmacs" in the future. Or maybe "debmacs".
I consider it offensive. Of course, RMS has done his best to be offensive
about this in recent months, so why should he change now?
> there were a Linux based system that did not use GNU code, then
> `linux' would differentiate. But, see, there isn't.
This one is a non sequitur.