Re: Building postgres requires bmake. Should it be a seperate package?

To: gthomas@native-ed.bc.ca
Cc: debian-devel@Pixar.com
Subject: Re: Building postgres requires bmake. Should it be a seperate package?
From: rdm@tad.micro.umn.edu
Date: Fri, 25 Aug 1995 13:47:35 -0400
Message-id: <[🔎] 199508251747.NAA09669@magenta.com>
Reply-to: rdm@tad.micro.umn.edu
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 9508251746.AA29331@native-ed.bc.ca> (gthomas@native-ed.bc.ca)

Guy R. Thomas:
   3) package bmake separately .  However I can't seem to find it
   separated from postgres.

Can't you follow the approach of having several binary packages
branched off the one main source package?  I know other package
maintainers are doing this...

-- 
Raul

Reply to:

References:
- Building postgres requires bmake. Should it be a seperate package?
  - From: "Guy R. Thomas" <gthomas@native-ed.bc.ca>

Prev by Date: Re: Postgres file locations
Next by Date: Re: Building postgres requires bmake. Should it be a seperate package?
Previous by thread: Building postgres requires bmake. Should it be a seperate package?
Next by thread: Re: Building postgres requires bmake. Should it be a seperate package?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread