Re: libecw

[Jorge Garcia <jorgegarcia@guadaltel.es>]

El Jueves 12 Enero 2006 11:20, Aníbal Monsalve Salazar escribió:
> On Thu, Jan 12, 2006 at 10:25:29AM +0100, Alberto Gonzalez Iniesta wrote:
> >[1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=293346
>
> JPEG 2000 es no-libre.
Y ponerlo en non-free ?
>
> <anibal> if a license limits you to not change the format of a file, is it
> dfsg compliant? <asuffield> doubt it
> <anibal> I'm reading http://bugs.debian.org/293346
> <asuffield> jpeg 2000. I know how this is going to go
> <anibal> that's right
> <asuffield> yup, standard jpeg 2000 "forking is banned" license
> <asuffield> we've seen that one before
> <asuffield> utter joke it is
> <anibal> may I quote your comment?
> <asuffield> if you must, but the one you're looking for is the old jasper
> license <asuffield> I think that one actually got unfucked in the end
> <asuffield> few years ago on -legal
> <asuffield> the basic problem is that it precludes the possibility of there
> ever being a jpeg 2006
>
> Aníbal Monsalve Salazar
> --
>  .''`. Debian GNU/Linux
>
> : :' : Free Operating System
>
> `. `'  http://debian.org/
>   `-   http://v7w.com/anibal