Re: Celebración de la Debconf-ES II en Guadalajara, diciembre 2005
Jesus Climent wrote:
> El DNS sigue sin resolverme correo.debian.org.es:
Chungo:
~-amaya@aenima>dig debian.org.es MX
; <<>> DiG 9.3.1 <<>> debian.org.es MX
;; global options: printcmd
;; Got answer:
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 43454
;; flags:; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 1, AUTHORITY: 1, ADDITIONAL: 1
;; QUESTION SECTION:
;debian.org.es. IN MX
;; ANSWER SECTION:
debian.org.es. 603303 IN MX 10 correo.debian.org.es.
;; AUTHORITY SECTION:
debian.org.es. 603303 IN NS ns1.debian.org.es.
;; ADDITIONAL SECTION:
correo.debian.org.es. 603303 IN A 193.127.103.130
;; Query time: 46 msec
;; SERVER: 192.168.0.1#53(192.168.0.1)
;; WHEN: Thu Oct 13 16:06:52 2005
;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 88
~-amaya@aenima>host correo.debian.org.es
Host correo.debian.org.es not found: 3(NXDOMAIN)
Y debian-es.org?
~-amaya@aenima>dig debian-es.org MX
; <<>> DiG 9.3.1 <<>> debian-es.org MX
;; global options: printcmd
;; Got answer:
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 42050
;; flags:; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 1, AUTHORITY: 3, ADDITIONAL: 4
;; QUESTION SECTION:
;debian-es.org. IN MX
;; ANSWER SECTION:
debian-es.org. 16200 IN MX 100 mx.debian-es.org.
;; AUTHORITY SECTION:
debian-es.org. 1360 IN NS ns0.debian-es.org.
debian-es.org. 1360 IN NS ns1.debian-es.org.
debian-es.org. 1360 IN NS ns2.debian-es.org.
;; ADDITIONAL SECTION:
mx.debian-es.org. 14400 IN A 193.127.103.130
ns0.debian-es.org. 22960 IN A 193.127.103.130
ns1.debian-es.org. 22960 IN A 62.93.161.109
ns2.debian-es.org. 66063 IN A 213.98.54.4
;; Query time: 59 msec
;; SERVER: 192.168.0.1#53(192.168.0.1)
;; WHEN: Thu Oct 13 16:07:36 2005
;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 168
~-amaya@aenima>host mx.debian-es.org
mx.debian-es.org has address 193.127.103.130
Host mx.debian-es.org not found: 3(NXDOMAIN)
Host mx.debian-es.org not found: 3(NXDOMAIN)
Algo pasa, no?
--
.''`. Follow the white Rabbit - Ranty (and Lewis Carroll)
: :' :
`. `' Proudly running unstable Debian GNU/Linux
`- www.amayita.com www.malapecora.com www.chicasduras.com
Reply to: