On Thu, Jan 10, 2008 at 01:24:13PM +0100, Vincent Fourmond wrote: > You should be able to go with convert, then (ImageMagick). convert > is extremely powerful and quite stable (it has too, it is a > command-line-only tool). convert natively reads XCF images, and I > would be very surprised if it doesn't keep layer information (I didn't > have time to check though). Nice. I was considering that, but expected to need a different image format for it. > If you want, I may dig into that sometime soon. That would be nice. Please let me know if you do, because I may also work on it if I have time (which shouldn't be too soon ;-) ). > I'll need some explanations probably about what is currently being > done. I think the gimp script (art/mktiles in the source) is pretty self-explanatory (even though I had to remove all comments to let gimp accept it). It starts with some function definitions, followed by lots of understandable statements (show/hide/mirror/turn/save). All arguments are layer names (defined at the top), except for save, which takes a filename. Thanks, Bas -- I encourage people to send encrypted e-mail (see http://www.gnupg.org). If you have problems reading my e-mail, use a better reader. Please send the central message of e-mails as plain text in the message body, not as HTML and definitely not as MS Word. Please do not use the MS Word format for attachments either. For more information, see http://pcbcn10.phys.rug.nl/e-mail.html
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature