[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Accepted amule 2.1.2-2 (source i386 all)



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Mon,  5 Jun 2006 01:50:41 +0200
Source: amule
Binary: amule amule-daemon amule-common amule-utils amule-utils-gui
Architecture: source i386 all
Version: 2.1.2-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Julien Delange <julien@gunnm.org>
Changed-By: Adeodato Simó <dato@net.com.org.es>
Description: 
 amule      - All-platform eMule P2P Client
 amule-common - common files for aMule
 amule-daemon - aMule daemon
 amule-utils - utilities for amule
 amule-utils-gui - User-friendly utilities for amule
Closes: 368381 369995 370068
Changes: 
 amule (2.1.2-2) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * The "Oooh, poor kiddo" release.
 .
   * Overhaul debian/rules. Among other changes:
     + provide a binary-arch target that actually builds some .debs; this fixes
       recent FTBFS in buildds.  (Closes: #369995)
     + do not call ./configure more times than needed. (Closes: #368381)
     + remove dpatch, since it is no longer used; drop build-dependency, and
       delete no longer used patches from the patches/ subdirectory as well.
     + build-depend on autotools-dev, to ensure that the config.{sub,guess}
       snippet actually makes us build against the latest version of these files.
     + use debhelper *.install files instead of mv commands from debian/rules;
       while at it, remove *.dirs files, since they're not needed.
     + use $builddir != $srcdir, to make the clean rule simpler.
 .
   * Add to amule-utils missing Replaces: amule (<< 2.1.2-1) (closes: #370068).
     In amule 2.1.1-3, debian/rules called dh_link without -pamule-common, thus
     shipping the symlinks in amule instead of amule-common.
 .
   * Do not ship the placeholder manpages from the debian/mans directory, and
     ship the ones provided by upstream, which have actual content, are useful
     and translated to four languages.
 .
   * Add missing dpkg-divert --remove /usr/share/man/man1/ed2k.1.gz in
     amule-utils.postrm. Will hopefully get totally rid of dpkg-divert in the
     next upload.
 .
   * Remove debian/amule.postinst and debian/amule-utils-gui.postinst, since
     they only contain the very same snippet dh_installmenu already installs.
 .
   * Make amule-utils-gui.menu point to wxcas.xpm and alc.xpm instead of using
     amule.xpm for all three shipped binaries, and ship a copy of amule.xpm as
     amulegui.xpm since amule-utils-gui does not depend on amule (thx, lintian).
 .
   * Fix debian/watch file; now the http://sf.net shortcut is used.
 .
   * Add myself as an uploader, and mutter something about #369995 traffic.
Files: 
 293ab3c65643916d09e3432becba7093 837 x11 optional amule_2.1.2-2.dsc
 0022da24bec113f3309507be4f827701 18389 x11 optional amule_2.1.2-2.diff.gz
 5dcf7f44c88ff5a5dbc0dd1e5e34e10f 1274000 x11 optional amule_2.1.2-2_i386.deb
 2bb4604c06b41b59f91687be04016c14 239320 x11 optional amule-utils_2.1.2-2_i386.deb
 aeff7ea4b49f2f207c492a0b17c89e62 965582 x11 optional amule-utils-gui_2.1.2-2_i386.deb
 a76b1eabb66a0957c770d1ae7736ae8b 1464002 x11 optional amule-daemon_2.1.2-2_i386.deb
 0d72782858663054fa0f9ffb213e7cc4 1198650 x11 optional amule-common_2.1.2-2_all.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Signed by Adeodato Simó <dato@net.com.org.es>

iEYEARECAAYFAkSDc2oACgkQgyNlRdHEGIKdiwCfaqv/3Gac/UUO1HslGQVbkCFF
SvUAoLqx0OZC2jTATIQuka1mtSzal1/S
=92xC
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Accepted:
amule-common_2.1.2-2_all.deb
  to pool/main/a/amule/amule-common_2.1.2-2_all.deb
amule-daemon_2.1.2-2_i386.deb
  to pool/main/a/amule/amule-daemon_2.1.2-2_i386.deb
amule-utils-gui_2.1.2-2_i386.deb
  to pool/main/a/amule/amule-utils-gui_2.1.2-2_i386.deb
amule-utils_2.1.2-2_i386.deb
  to pool/main/a/amule/amule-utils_2.1.2-2_i386.deb
amule_2.1.2-2.diff.gz
  to pool/main/a/amule/amule_2.1.2-2.diff.gz
amule_2.1.2-2.dsc
  to pool/main/a/amule/amule_2.1.2-2.dsc
amule_2.1.2-2_i386.deb
  to pool/main/a/amule/amule_2.1.2-2_i386.deb



Reply to: