Accepted dovecot 1.0.beta8-2 (source i386)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 21 May 2006 13:16:17 -0400
Source: dovecot
Binary: dovecot-common dovecot-pop3d dovecot-imapd
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.0.beta8-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: high
Maintainer: Jaldhar H. Vyas <jaldhar-dovecot@debian.org>
Changed-By: Jaldhar H. Vyas <jaldhar@debian.org>
Description:
dovecot-common - secure mail server that supports mbox and maildir mailboxes
dovecot-imapd - secure IMAP server that supports mbox and maildir mailboxes
dovecot-pop3d - secure POP3 server that supports mbox and maildir mailboxes
Closes: 361536 364766
Changes:
dovecot (1.0.beta8-2) unstable; urgency=high
.
* Don't chown/chmod ssl certificate unless we created it.
(Closes: #364766)
* Upstream fixed the crash if passwd-file had entries without passwords.
(Closes: #361536)
* fixed up the last versions changelog to better describe the security
problem which was fixed there.
Files:
5990eaed5a4f2c6006644d24535126cc 890 mail optional dovecot_1.0.beta8-2.dsc
8fe5e01f2a636aff4bb844239bab16e5 117597 mail optional dovecot_1.0.beta8-2.diff.gz
af009054143c3838216e5c5ced3643eb 953898 mail optional dovecot-common_1.0.beta8-2_i386.deb
8a5cc11a328d78f6e25849ca49e32d19 532438 mail optional dovecot-imapd_1.0.beta8-2_i386.deb
402a3aec66177ff2931652dc2827a8a8 500324 mail optional dovecot-pop3d_1.0.beta8-2_i386.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFEcLUC2kYOR+5txmoRAlABAJ4m+OOnvsKf3UnIb05YNKDA4YyUtgCeLoNl
blcesCApGp/7cJKGTDrDsBo=
=NO1F
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Accepted:
dovecot-common_1.0.beta8-2_i386.deb
to pool/main/d/dovecot/dovecot-common_1.0.beta8-2_i386.deb
dovecot-imapd_1.0.beta8-2_i386.deb
to pool/main/d/dovecot/dovecot-imapd_1.0.beta8-2_i386.deb
dovecot-pop3d_1.0.beta8-2_i386.deb
to pool/main/d/dovecot/dovecot-pop3d_1.0.beta8-2_i386.deb
dovecot_1.0.beta8-2.diff.gz
to pool/main/d/dovecot/dovecot_1.0.beta8-2.diff.gz
dovecot_1.0.beta8-2.dsc
to pool/main/d/dovecot/dovecot_1.0.beta8-2.dsc
Reply to: