[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Uploaded dwww 1.4.3.5-1.1 (m68k) to erlangen



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

Format: 1.6
Date: Sat, 30 Oct 1999 15:57:54 +0200
Source: dwww
Binary: dwww
Architecture: m68k
Version: 1.4.3.5-1.1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian/m68k Build Daemon <buildd@m68k.debian.org>
Description: 
 dwww       - Read all on-line documentation via WWW
Closes: 10042 19054 26794 29502 34015 34456 35788 37378 38821 41106 43094 45092 45375 47469
Changes: 
 dwww (1.4.3.5-1.1) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * NMU.
   * Recompiled against fixed publib-dev; fixes dwww-txt2html crashes.
     (Closes: #38821, #45092, #45375).
   * [dwwwconfig] Fixed chown call to protect against whole system chown in
     case of pilot error. (Closes: #43094).
   * [dwww-find] use /bin/sh rather than bash. (Closes: #19054).
   * [dwww.cgi] Fixed filename match regexp as per Mark Summerfield's
     suggestion. Makes dwww deal with perl module manpages properly.
     (Closes: #26794, #34015, #34456, #35788, #41106)
   * [Makefile] Use '!' as negator in character-class glob to remove '^'
     bashism. (Closes: #47469)
   * Applied AMAZING CURE 4 HAIR LOSS to README and make it go boldly.
   * Put in a note in the README to point to doc-base as the uniform
     documentation registration system.
   * My older NMU has been acknowledged implictly. (Closes: #37378)
   * The cron job cds to a known-good directory since 1.4.1-1 (Closes: #10042)
   * The cron job does not seem to call update-menus anymore. (Closes: #29502)
   * Call update-menus in postinst and postrm (Lintian).
Files: 
 6f35dd222cbccef4aeca005d1e430e95 51154 doc optional dwww_1.4.3.5-1.1_m68k.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3ia
Charset: latin1

iQCVAwUBOB/79nVhJ0HiWnvJAQFMXAQAkEyDqrrM/1bx636v9lzxSDsKltRNI/D7
rbupwusBoQl40vEqQQLu+zp+XlcGoIqhvFZkdUG0eoaxdKQkIkpr/RK1/2nPidyG
JufF2e+3BrD8pq20sO0KDUGnIefIIrW/LW+h+wRKTn1QCT4X9dpb102FP2ekEttz
sHzk0/KeE54=
=5Ffe
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: