[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

[CTTE #681783] "Recommends", particularly in metapackages



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

The question of the use of Recommends, particularly in the context of
metapackages, was referred to the Technical Committee.

The TC has made the following decision:

  Whereas:

  1. The Technical Committee's view is that the existing policy
     on Recommends is correct.

  2. Specifically, we feel that there is nothing inherently wrong with
     using Recommends in a metapackage.  Any infelicities in package
     management software's handling of Recommends (in metapackages or
     more generally) should be treated as bugs.

  3. It may be that policy could be clarified in this area, for
     example to make it clear that if a user chooses not to install
     Recommends, some things may not work, and that that would not be
     a bug.

  Therefore:

  4. We do not make a ruling about the content of policy.

  5. We advise the policy maintainers to consider how to clarify
     this, and to make whatever changes they consider appropriate.

Please see http://bugs.debian.org/681783 for background and
discussion.  The advice from point 5 has been passed on to the policy
maintainers, in the form of http://bugs.debian.org/685746.

This general question about Recommends arose in the context of the
dependency from the gnome-core metapackage to network-manager-gnome.
The TC is still considering that more specific issue; see
http://bugs.debian.org/681834.

Ian.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)

iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJQN4tYAAoJEOPjOSNItQ05p78H+wSpC37JhqI6q5Pd3/aG6C80
+Q8bwnEnL6xoM1OhzGcBsZsxliw11zPHL7x2XsusRxQJW8ueYSPllbodlc2OKrcK
yygFVvA/g9X5o6OMORONRDeXRyJoZaDfmBh9QBxy9Uhpn9GtG4BdGGsvqlJo0RCT
8WzDiPVwYr4kiYanNqbX8eoEFrpmXkz/GxG6dFTHoaL79dQxuxJNDGwk1ok4HFMn
iNH/LZyAiDwq6OuyY4s/0B8B6a81OQVi9WGJWxMQ9gVhSqxnfbxqfiRuynytoNHC
ABh60PNQHIpmahePaWbkcXWzRNdYk1t93eYeTGaAwjJfK7HO0cC1ZW7ezyCIf/o=
=G6JR
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: