Hi,
The resolution that passed is (in wdiff format)
--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
5.2. Appointment
1. The Project Leader is elected by the Developers.
2. The election begins [-nine-] {+six+} weeks before the leadership
post becomes vacant, or (if it is too late already) immediately.
3. For the [-following three weeks-] {+first week+} any Developer
may nominate themselves as a candidate Project [-Leader.-]
{+Leader, and summarise their plans for their term.+}
4. For three weeks after that no more candidates may be nominated;
candidates should use this time for campaigning [-(to make their
identities-] and [-positions known).-] {+discussion.+} If there
are no candidates at the end of the nomination period then the
nomination period is extended for [-three further weeks,-] {+an
additional week,+} repeatedly if necessary.
5. The next [-three-] {+two+} weeks are the polling period during
which Developers may cast their votes. Votes in leadership
elections are kept secret, even after the election is finished.
6. The options on the ballot will be those candidates who have
nominated themselves and have not yet withdrawn, plus None Of The
Above. If None Of The Above wins the election then the election
procedure is repeated, many times if necessary.
7. The decision will be made using the method specified in section
A.6 of the Standard Resolution Procedure. The quorum is the same
as for a General Resolution (4.2) and the default option is "None
Of The Above".
8. The Project Leader serves for one year from their election.
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
manoj
Starting results calculation at Sun Oct 7 00:01:11 2007
Option 1 "Choice 1: Reduce the length of DPL election process"
Option 2 "Choice 2: As above, but do not change election start date in section 5.2.2"
Option 3 "Choice 3: Further Discussion"
In the following table, tally[row x][col y] represents the votes that
option x received over option y.
Option
1 2 3
=== === ===
Option 1 129 196
Option 2 82 159
Option 3 29 51
Looking at row 2, column 1, Choice 2: As above, but do not change
election start date in section 5.2.2
received 82 votes over Choice 1: Reduce the length of DPL election
process
Looking at row 1, column 2, Choice 1: Reduce the length of DPL election
process
received 129 votes over Choice 2: As above, but do not change election
start date in section 5.2.2.
Option 1 Reached quorum: 196 > 48.5824042221049
Option 2 Reached quorum: 159 > 48.5824042221049
Option 1 passes Majority. 6.759 (196/29) >= 3
Option 2 passes Majority. 3.118 (159/51) >= 3
Option 1 defeats Option 2 by ( 129 - 82) = 47 votes.
Option 1 defeats Option 3 by ( 196 - 29) = 167 votes.
Option 2 defeats Option 3 by ( 159 - 51) = 108 votes.
The Schwartz Set contains:
Option 1 "Choice 1: Reduce the length of DPL election process"
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
The winners are:
Option 1 "Choice 1: Reduce the length of DPL election process"
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
--
"Now here's something you're really going to like!" Rocket J. Squirrel
Debian Project Secretary <secretary@debian.org> <http://vote.debian.org//>
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C
Attachment:
pgpMgQYkN5VV_.pgp
Description: PGP signature