Re: Logo procedure and ideas
On Thu, Apr 15, 1999 at 11:06:11AM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> >
> > What we should be voting on is the concept. When we have a good
> > ...
> I'm really happy that someone who is more important for the project than
> me offers this opinion. Please let us develop a concept first and than
> a logo.
*hands over head*
Nonono. This won't work. There will be a lot of talk, hundreds of emails
about hundreds of opinions, suggestions, rebuttals, critiques, and the
outcome will be essentially nil. We've seen this before. Maybe I am too
pessimistic, but at LEAST discuss this on another list so I don't need to
unsubscribe from any important list for this.
> It doesn't matter how long the logo election proces will last.
It will last forever if the above procedure is followed. It will last
forever if we don't get a proposal accepted to vote on it.
> Our releases need much time, too. In my opinion we could elect a good
> logo until potato will be released. But we will manage it only, if we
> have a *clear concept* what we want as logo. Otherway we will
> discuss until Debian version 17.4 about the logo topic :-(.
We already are doing this. The logo issue is essentially open since more
then two years.
Marcus
--
`Rhubarb is no Egyptian god.' Debian http://www.debian.org finger brinkmd@
Marcus Brinkmann GNU http://www.gnu.org master.debian.org
Marcus.Brinkmann@ruhr-uni-bochum.de for public PGP Key
http://homepage.ruhr-uni-bochum.de/Marcus.Brinkmann/ PGP Key ID 36E7CD09
Reply to: