Re: MoCalc licensing terms (fwd)
this is to couple my last message re mocalc
it may clarify anything I've left unclear or misinterpreted :P
---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Sat, 10 Apr 1999 23:28:16 -0400 (EDT)
From: Michael E. Corral <as392@detroit.freenet.org>
To: Andrew Dvorak <breakerx@valinor.ssd.k12.wa.us>
Subject: Re: MoCalc licensing terms
Andrew,
When I created mocalc, I put no licensing restrictions on it.
I have no problem putting it under the GPL. If you want to, I give you
permission to put it under the GPL.
The more mocalc users, the better!
Michael Corral: as392@detroit.freenet.org
"I want to die in my sleep, just like my grandfather...
Not screaming and yelling like the passengers in his car."
----------------------------------------------------------
On Fri, 9 Apr 1999, Andrew Dvorak wrote:
> I will soon be a one of many hundreds of developers of the Debian Linux
> distribution. Prior to my packaging mocalc for this distribution, it is
> required that I know the terms under which mocalc is licensed. GPL
> (preferred)? If you know of somebody else who is working on (or has
> packaged) mocalc for the debian distribution, I should like to know that
> information, as well.
>
> thanks a lot :)
> Andrew Dvorak
>
> -----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----
> Version: 2.6.3a
>
> mQCNAzbyGZoAAAEEAMwFhsTBlMqZj4+WSA0r3KbHVpqYwr5HKAcXeYXMO1F7NpL1
> ODR3lV3MdY2vDsYTJzAxUK+DU+/U7ScsvbP169d7B7is6vIbfc9DK97hAczvSHEu
> qgL6xSswzHl+C1Rp50ciiPj2YX+5sozWyY2HCjSzNsp8nLBjPbxenmxYJVW9AAUR
> tCdBbmRyZXcgRHZvcmFrIDxjb21wdXRlcl9uZXJkQGluYW1lLmNvbT6JAJUDBRA2
> 8hmavF6ebFglVb0BAaOyA/9JOgcn5fpsEsPuBRdtkjPUNnmlcZRh8vmUupSXQMOI
> yy4rRTVQSF622vCwqaxBxsWYksYM4hUa0mQEU+kyRxdPCqxnqQ+XKgUL5EQMd4LZ
> 759jdUrGQuX/oflcDUhtuZNGAMdUCXsLZvA3B0vP5BsqPojAQJ0uViupOur9M1dk
> Hg==
> =I0ty
> -----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----
>
>
>
Reply to: