Re: RFC: Mail to root instead of postinst messages?

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: RFC: Mail to root instead of postinst messages?
From: "J.H.M. Dassen" <jdassen@wi.leidenuniv.nl>
Date: Mon, 12 Apr 1999 20:46:44 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 19990412204644.A5899@ultra5.wi.leidenuniv.nl>
Mail-followup-to: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 19990412183709.A824@sci.fi>; from Riku Voipio on Mon, Apr 12, 1999 at 06:37:09PM +0300
References: <[🔎] 19990412183709.A824@sci.fi>

On Mon, Apr 12, 1999 at 18:37:09 +0300, Riku Voipio wrote:
> Why not just send any important messages via mail to root?

I'd rather have an indirection inbetween, to allow the local sysadmin to do
something different, like putting the message(s) in the sysvnews spool.

Ray
-- 
ART  A friend of mine in Tulsa, Okla., when I was about eleven years old. 
I'd be interested to hear from him. There are so many pseudos around taking 
his name in vain. 
- The Hipcrime Vocab by Chad C. Mulligan

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: RFC: Mail to root instead of postinst messages?
  - From: md@linux.it (Marco d'Itri)

References:
- RFC: Mail to root instead of postinst messages?
  - From: Riku Voipio <riku.voipio@iki.fi>

Prev by Date: RFC: Mail to root instead of postinst messages?
Next by Date: Giving up telnet98 and telnetd98
Previous by thread: RFC: Mail to root instead of postinst messages?
Next by thread: Re: RFC: Mail to root instead of postinst messages?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread