On Tue, Mar 16, 2004 at 01:54:10PM +0200, Toni Heinonen wrote: > Security-wise, I think it's kind of silly portmapper is still on by > default. People don't even need it most of the time! Is there any > pressing reasons why at least nfs-kernel-server and nfs-common and > preferrably portmap couldn't be optional, and not in the standard base > install? > > And is there some pressing reasons why we couldn't unbundle gcc and > other development tools from the standard base install? I just did an install of woody the other day, and none of the packages you mention were installed by default. What type of install are you talking about? -- gram
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature