On Thu, Feb 19, 2004 at 09:29:20PM +0000, Will Newton wrote: > On Thursday 19 Feb 2004 8:22 pm, Andrew Suffield wrote: > > > All well-written perl is like this. If it's not clean and precise then > > it's bad perl. The fact that there is a lot of bad perl around does > > not affect this. > > In my experience it is not so much that there is bad Perl, which there is, but > that Perl doesn't seem to scale to large teams. Then your experience has been entirely of bad perl. It's that simple. > Are there any projects out there with ~200,000 lines of Perl and 8-10 > full-time developers that aren't a total train wreck? (I know of one at least > that is) Evidently "yes", then. There's also perl itself. -- .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield : :' : http://www.debian.org/ | `. `' | `- -><- |
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature