Re: Debian needs more buildds. It has offers. They aren't beingaccepted.
On Thu, Feb 19, 2004 at 04:58:04AM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> > > > Obviously it was in weak-no-auto-build. That's fairly ok when there is no
> > > > huge backlog. So the question is more, why the buildd admin realised that
> > > > problem and didn't act on it?
> > > Our DPL realised the problem (Took 6 mails, 3 each, and didn't take a
> > > day I think. Thats communication.), not the buildd admin. I haven't seen
> > > any indication yet that the configuration was changed, the next
> > > qt-x11-free upload will tell.
> > [...]
> > Guessing that it was in weak-no-auto-build was easy. That it need 6 mails
> > is, well, .... I think I better to go to bed now and don't think about it
> > anymore... ;)
> I guess weak-no-auto-build, he looked in /etc/sbuild.conf, I said to
> look in buildd.conf, he looked for /etc/buildd.conf (not finding it),
> I said ~buildd/buildd.conf and then he found it. Of course someone
> familiar with the buildds, like the administrator, would have known
> the right place on the first try.
> What I ment to emphasis with the 6 mails was more how well, fast and
> friendly communicating with the DPL is. An example to us all. :)
Ah, ok, I understood the 6 mails as being sent between DPL and buildd admin.
:)
--
Ciao... //
Ingo \X/
Reply to: