On Fri, Aug 01, 2003 at 11:18:53AM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote: > > I also think it would be a good idea for policy to require all setuid/gid > > bit grants to go through this or another list for peer review, much as > > pre-depends are supposed to. > > I absolutely support this idea. All set[ug]id setups should be reviewed > before they go in the archive, and I volunteer to do the review (though I > hope that others will help). Does this need a proposal to go into policy > with the same force as the existing pre-depends verbiage? I would support such a change too, and would volunteer to assist if there was need for it. Steve --
Attachment:
pgpDLqJWkMSb8.pgp
Description: PGP signature