On Sun, Mar 23, 2003 at 04:02:29PM +0100, Wichert Akkerman wrote: > Previously Martin Michlmayr wrote: > > Shouldn't this listing ignore packages which are not in unstable? > > It's a list for testing, not unstable. Wouldn't a list for unstable be more useful? Testing shouldn't contain any release critical bugs, in theory. Hamish -- Hamish Moffatt VK3SB <hamish@debian.org> <hamish@cloud.net.au>