Re: Migration of non-free packages to testing
Anthony Towns <aj@azure.humbug.org.au> writes:
> On Wed, Nov 13, 2002 at 06:05:46PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
> > Matt Zimmerman <mdz@debian.org> writes:
> > > What this means when the program's original source code is not available is
> > > unclear. "preferred" among the forms which actually exist, or "preferred"
> > > in an ideal situation?
> > The latter.
>
> I have write an Intercal program, and compile it, does that mean the
> source code for the compiled binary is in C?
:) I think you have to examine the specific case. The point is that
you can't evade the GPLs rules by saying "I refuse to distribute the C
code, so that means the assembly code is the preferred *available*
form."
Reply to: