BAD signature from "Wichert Akkerman <wakkerma@debian.org>"

To: Debian development list <debian-devel@lists.debian.org>, Wichert Akkerman <wichert@mors.wiggy.net>
Subject: BAD signature from "Wichert Akkerman <wakkerma@debian.org>"
From: Edward Betts <edward@debian.org>
Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2000 22:27:44 +0100
Message-id: <20000426222744.A2992@wb010.wav1.uea.ac.uk>
Mail-followup-to: Debian development list <debian-devel@lists.debian.org>, Wichert Akkerman <wichert@mors.wiggy.net>
In-reply-to: <20000426164642.A5041@mors.wiggy.net>; from wichert@mors.wiggy.net on Wed, Apr 26, 2000 at 04:46:42PM +0200
References: <20000426164642.A5041@mors.wiggy.net>

Gnupg give me a bad signature on Wichert's message just posted to debian-announce.
What is the deal? Is it just me, or did other people get the same?

-- 
Don't worry  --  shop.

Attachment: pgpcew1lNGkuJ.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: BAD signature from "Wichert Akkerman <wakkerma@debian.org>"
  - From: Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho <gaia@iki.fi>
- Re: BAD signature from "Wichert Akkerman <wakkerma@debian.org>"
  - From: Damian M Gryski <dgryski@uwaterloo.ca>

Prev by Date: Re: apt-get should correctly process dependencies
Next by Date: tcl module installation
Previous by thread: ITP: irssi-common, irssi-tty, irssi-gtk, irssi-gnome
Next by thread: Re: BAD signature from "Wichert Akkerman <wakkerma@debian.org>"
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread