Bug#36028: marked as done (debbugs: bugs-fetch2.pl has database-location hardcoded)
Your message dated Fri, 18 Oct 2002 03:14:07 +0100
with message-id <20021018021407.GA19152@riva.ucam.org>
and subject line Fixed?
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Apr 1999 20:30:16 +0000
Received: (qmail 10523 invoked from network); 13 Apr 1999 20:30:15 -0000
Received: from zeus.wi.leidenuniv.nl (132.229.128.1)
by master.debian.org with SMTP; 13 Apr 1999 20:30:15 -0000
Received: from lightning.mors.net (root@home004.wi.leidenuniv.nl [132.229.210.132])
by zeus.wi.leidenuniv.nl (8.8.8/8.8.8/WI) with ESMTP id WAA14196
for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Tue, 13 Apr 1999 22:30:12 +0200 (MET DST)
From: Wichert Akkerman <wichert@cs.leidenuniv.nl>
Received: (from wichert@localhost)
by lightning.mors.net (8.9.3/8.9.3/Debian/GNU) id TAA08030;
Tue, 13 Apr 1999 19:01:06 +0200
Date: Tue, 13 Apr 1999 19:01:06 +0200
Message-Id: <199904131701.TAA08030@lightning.mors.net>
Subject: debbugs: bugs-fetch2.pl has database-location hardcoded
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Mailer: bug 3.1.7
Package: debbugs
Version: 2.1-1
bugs-fetch2.pl currently always uses /Bugs/db as the location for the
bugs database. I suggest it is modified to use $gWebDomain instead,
or a new variable (probably better since $gWebDomain includes a hostname
which is bad when you mirror the page; maybe split $gWebDomain into
$gWebServer and $gWebStart).
Wichert.
-- System Information
Debian Release: 2.1
Kernel Version: Linux lightning 2.2.5 #1 Mon Apr 5 16:28:59 CEST 1999 i586 unknown
Versions of the packages debbugs depends on:
ii perl 5.004.04-7 Larry Wall's Practical Extracting and Report
ii lynx 2.8.1-3 Text-mode WWW Browser
ii sendmail 8.9.3-1 A powerful mail transport agent.
^^^ (Provides virtual package mail-transport-agent)
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 36028-done) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Oct 2002 02:14:09 +0000
>From cjwatson@flatline.org.uk Thu Oct 17 21:14:09 2002
Return-path: <cjwatson@flatline.org.uk>
Received: from carbon.btinternet.com [194.73.73.92]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 182MeO-0007Zj-00; Thu, 17 Oct 2002 21:14:09 -0500
Received: from [217.34.69.149] (helo=riva.lab.dotat.at)
by carbon.btinternet.com with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #8)
id 182MeN-0000U8-00; Fri, 18 Oct 2002 03:14:07 +0100
Received: from cjwatson by riva.lab.dotat.at with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 182MeN-0004zH-00; Fri, 18 Oct 2002 03:14:07 +0100
Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2002 03:14:07 +0100
From: Colin Watson <cjwatson@debian.org>
To: Tollef Fog Heen <tollef@add.no>
Cc: 36028-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Fixed?
Message-ID: <20021018021407.GA19152@riva.ucam.org>
References: <87n195j9x4.fsf@arabella.pvv.ntnu.no>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <87n195j9x4.fsf@arabella.pvv.ntnu.no>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i
Sender: Colin Watson <cjwatson@riva.ucam.org>
Delivered-To: 36028-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-16.0 required=5.0
tests=IN_REP_TO,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES,
SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,USER_AGENT,
USER_AGENT_MUTT
version=2.41
X-Spam-Level:
On Wed, Apr 25, 2001 at 05:06:47PM +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> This bug seems to be fixed - at least there are $base references
> around where they should be, it seems.
Yes, this has been fixed for ages now. Joy changed bugs-fetch2.pl to use
$gWebHostBugDir rather than hard-coding /Bugs in January 2001, and this
change was in debbugs 2.3-4.
Thanks,
--
Colin Watson [cjwatson@flatline.org.uk]
Reply to: