[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

[dak/master] fix the stupid commit that preceeded



Signed-off-by: Mike O'Connor <stew@vireo.org>
---
 dak/update_db.py   |    2 +-
 daklib/.#dbconn.py |    1 -
 daklib/binary.py   |    2 +-
 daklib/dbconn.py   |    2 +-
 4 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
 delete mode 120000 daklib/.#dbconn.py

diff --git a/dak/update_db.py b/dak/update_db.py
index b596f2f..55dda5d 100755
--- a/dak/update_db.py
+++ b/dak/update_db.py
@@ -45,7 +45,7 @@ from daklib.dak_exceptions import DBUpdateError
 
 Cnf = None
 projectB = None
-required_database_schema = 8
+required_database_schema = 9
 
 ################################################################################
 
diff --git a/daklib/.#dbconn.py b/daklib/.#dbconn.py
deleted file mode 120000
index ed69a0a..0000000
--- a/daklib/.#dbconn.py
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1 +0,0 @@
-stew@tang.vireo.org.14091:1236689528
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/daklib/binary.py b/daklib/binary.py
index 2e8028f..29c5c2a 100755
--- a/daklib/binary.py
+++ b/daklib/binary.py
@@ -141,7 +141,7 @@ class Binary(object):
             if en(self.chunks) < 3:
                 rejected = True
                 self.reject("%s: found %d chunks, expected at least 3." % (self.filename, len(self.chunks)))
-        else
+        else:
             if en(self.chunks) != 3:
                 rejected = True
                 self.reject("%s: found %d chunks, expected 3." % (self.filename, len(self.chunks)))
diff --git a/daklib/dbconn.py b/daklib/dbconn.py
index 2c4d1a0..c290b60 100755
--- a/daklib/dbconn.py
+++ b/daklib/dbconn.py
@@ -546,7 +546,7 @@ class DBConn(Singleton):
 
         c.execute("BEGIN WORK")
         try:
-            arch_id = self.get_architecture_id(package[Architecture])
+            arch_id = self.get_architecture_id(package['Architecture'])
 
                 # Remove any already existing recorded files for this package
             c.execute("""DELETE FROM pending_content_associations
-- 
1.5.6.5


Reply to: