|| On Tue, 29 Jun 2004 18:07:04 +0200 (CEST) || Andreas Tille <tillea@rki.de> wrote: at> On Tue, 29 Jun 2004, Otavio Salvador wrote: >> I understand it later looking at source code. What I did is >> create a task called common because, in my case, I don't need >> user management now nor menu system. at> Just to make sure: Did you created a file tasks/common? I would not at> really do this because this name has a special meaning in other contents. at> If I were you I would choose a different name. at> BTW, do you think I would over estimate the importance of an extra at> user menu? IMHO this extra more user centric menu is a good help for at> our users. This is fine to me right now. I can move the task to base without problems ;-) Only one useful thing is bloke the task name common to be used. -- O T A V I O S A L V A D O R --------------------------------------------- E-mail: otavio@debian.org UIN: 5906116 GNU/Linux User: 239058 GPG ID: 49A5F855 Home Page: http://www.freedom.ind.br/otavio --------------------------------------------- "Microsoft gives you Windows ... Linux gives you the whole house."
Attachment:
pgp03v4dVdleC.pgp
Description: PGP signature