On Mon, 2003-02-03 at 05:03, Hamish Moffatt wrote: > Isn't the onus on you as the proponent of HTML to sell it to the rest of > us? Specifically, what is the advantage of HTML for email? What can you > communicate with HTML that you can't with plain text? > > Plain text has served email well for a couple of decades or more and I > still can't see any reason to change. I'm not really trying to sell it. I'm trying to find out why other people dislike it, and dispel any myths or half-truths about it. Alex. -- PGP Public Key: http://aoi.dyndns.org/~alex/pgp-public-key -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----- Version: 3.1 GCS d- s:++ a18 C++(++++)>$ UL+++(++++) P--- L+++>++++ E---- W+(+++) N- o-- K+ w--- !O M(+) V-- PS+++ PE-- Y+ PGP+(+++) t* 5-- X-- R tv b- DI D+++ G e h! !r y ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part