Bug#629385: Request for TC to rule on a course of action for supporting build-arch
On Mon, 06 Jun 2011, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> On 06/06/11 at 13:35 -0700, Don Armstrong wrote:
> > Happens; do you have any recollection of what the failures were
> > from? [Just trying to make sure that they were failures which were
> > fixable, and not some kind of unforeseen systematic problem.]
> No, sorry; that was almost four years ago!
If I was to vote today, I would vote 12543. Implementing another field
to keep in sync seems like a lot of additional work for little gain
(3), and making a slew of packages insta-buggy (4) is not something we
should do. (2) is a nice hack, but it depends too much on undocumented
My primary concern is that there is some kind of systematic problem
with #1 and #2 that we haven't yet considered that affects some
packages. Yet, if we do run into such a problem we can revisit this
I made a bunch of stickers
to put on rooftops, and in secret tunnels.
"If you are reading this,
then you are awesome"
-- a softer world #569